add adr and templates (#341)

also exclude them from generated site

docs/adr/0000-record-architecture-decisions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+# Record architecture decisions
+
+* Status: accepted
+* Date: 2023-10-16
+
+## Context
+
+We need to record the architectural decisions made on Opinionated Digital Center.
+
+## Decision
+
+We will use Architecture Decision Records, as [described by Michael Nygard](http://thinkrelevance.com/blog/2011/11/15/documenting-architecture-decisions).
+
+## Consequences
+
+See Michael Nygard's article, linked above.

docs/adr/0001-use-markdown-architectural-decision-records.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# Use Markdown Architectural Decision Records
+
+Adapted from
+[MADR's similar decision record](https://github.com/adr/madr/blob/2.1.2/docs/adr/0000-use-markdown-architectural-decision-records.md).
+
+* Status: accepted
+* Date: 2023-10-16
+
+## Context and Problem Statement
+
+We want to record architectural decisions made in this project.
+Which format and structure should these records follow?
+
+## Considered Options
+
+* [MADR](https://adr.github.io/madr/) 3.0.0 - The Markdown Architectural Decision Records
+* [Michael Nygard's template](http://thinkrelevance.com/blog/2011/11/15/documenting-architecture-decisions) - The first incarnation of the term "ADR"
+* [Sustainable Architectural Decisions](https://www.infoq.com/articles/sustainable-architectural-design-decisions) - The Y-Statements
+* Other templates listed at <https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture_decision_record>
+* Formless - No conventions for file format and structure
+
+## Decision Outcome
+
+Chosen option: "MADR 3.0.0", because
+
+* Implicit assumptions should be made explicit.
+  Design documentation is important to enable people understanding the decisions later on.
+  See also [A rational design process: How and why to fake it](https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.1986.6312940).
+* The MADR format is lean and fits our development style.
+* The MADR structure is comprehensible and facilitates usage & maintenance.
+* Version 3.0.0 is the latest one available when starting to document ADRs.
+
+### Positive Consequences
+
+The ADR are more structured. See especially:
+* [MADR-0002 - Do not use numbers in headings](https://github.com/adr/madr/blob/2.1.2/docs/adr/0002-do-not-use-numbers-in-headings.md).
+* [MADR-0005 - Use (unique number and) dashes in filenames](https://github.com/adr/madr/blob/2.1.2/docs/adr/0005-use-dashes-in-filenames.md).
+* [MADR-0010 - Support categories (in form of subfolders with local ids)](https://github.com/adr/madr/blob/2.1.2/docs/adr/0010-support-categories.md).
+* See [full set of MADR ADRs](https://github.com/adr/madr/blob/2.1.2/docs/adr).
+
+### Negative Consequences
+
+* Learning curve will be slightly longer.

docs/adr/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<!-- This file has been generated by `pyadr`. Manual changes will be erased at next generation. -->
+# Architecture Decision Records
+
+## Accepted Records
+
+* [0000 - Record architecture decisions](0000-record-architecture-decisions.md)
+* [0001 - Use Markdown Architectural Decision Records](0001-use-markdown-architectural-decision-records.md)
+
+## Rejected Records
+
+* None
+
+## Superseded Records
+
+* None
+
+## Deprecated Records
+
+* None
+
+## Records with non-standard statuses
+
+* None

docs/adr/template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+---
+# These are optional elements. Feel free to remove any of them.
+status: "{proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)}"
+date: {YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated}
+deciders: {list everyone involved in the decision}
+consulted: {list everyone whose opinions are sought (typically subject-matter experts); and with whom there is a two-way communication}
+informed: {list everyone who is kept up-to-date on progress; and with whom there is a one-way communication}
+---
+# {short title of solved problem and solution}
+
+## Context and Problem Statement
+
+{Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences or in the form of an illustrative story.
+ You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question and add links to collaboration boards or issue management systems.}
+
+<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
+## Decision Drivers
+
+* {decision driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …}
+* {decision driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …}
+* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
+
+## Considered Options
+
+* {title of option 1}
+* {title of option 2}
+* {title of option 3}
+* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
+
+## Decision Outcome
+
+Chosen option: "{title of option 1}", because
+{justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force {force} | … | comes out best (see below)}.
+
+<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
+### Consequences
+
+* Good, because {positive consequence, e.g., improvement of one or more desired qualities, …}
+* Bad, because {negative consequence, e.g., compromising one or more desired qualities, …}
+* … <!-- numbers of consequences can vary -->
+
+<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
+### Confirmation
+
+{Describe how the implementation of/compliance with the ADR is confirmed. E.g., by a review or an ArchUnit test.
+ Although we classify this element as optional, it is included in most ADRs.}
+
+<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
+## Pros and Cons of the Options
+
+### {title of option 1}
+
+<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
+{example | description | pointer to more information | …}
+
+* Good, because {argument a}
+* Good, because {argument b}
+<!-- use "neutral" if the given argument weights neither for good nor bad -->
+* Neutral, because {argument c}
+* Bad, because {argument d}
+* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
+
+### {title of other option}
+
+{example | description | pointer to more information | …}
+
+* Good, because {argument a}
+* Good, because {argument b}
+* Neutral, because {argument c}
+* Bad, because {argument d}
+* …
+
+<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
+## More Information
+
+{You might want to provide additional evidence/confidence for the decision outcome here and/or
+ document the team agreement on the decision and/or
+ define when/how this decision the decision should be realized and if/when it should be re-visited.
+Links to other decisions and resources might appear here as well.}

mkdocs.yml

@@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ extra_javascript:
   - javascripts/tablesort.js
 extra_css:
   - stylesheets/extra.css
+exclude_docs: |
+  /adr/
 watch:
   - docs
   - src