Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update references in Risk Tolerance #525

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 5, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 9 additions & 5 deletions docs/topics/risk_tolerance_and_priority.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
# Risk Tolerance and Response Priority

SSVC enables stakeholders to balance and manage their risks themselves.
We follow the risk management vocabulary from [@ISO73] and define risk as “effect of uncertainty on objectives;”
see [@ISO73] for notes on the terms in the definition.
We follow the risk management vocabulary from [ISO 31073:2022(en)
Risk management — Vocabulary](https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:31073:ed-1:v1:en) and define risk as “effect of uncertainty on objectives;”
see the original document for notes on the terms in the definition.
A successful vulnerability management practice must balance at least two risks:

!!! tip inline end "Contexualizing Risk"

To place these risks in context, we follow the SEI's Taxonomy of Operational Cyber Security Risks [@cebula2010taxonomy].
!!! tip inline end "Contextualizing Risk"

To place these risks in context, we follow the SEI's
[Taxonomy of Operational Cyber Security Risks](https://insights.sei.cmu.edu/library/a-taxonomy-of-operational-cyber-security-risks/).
**Change risk** can be characterized as a combination of Class 2 and/or Class 3 risks.

- Class 2: Systems and Technology Failures includes hardware, software, and systems risks.
Expand All @@ -26,6 +27,9 @@ In developing the decision trees in this document, we had in mind stakeholders w
We therefore remind our readers that the labels on the trees (defer, immediate, etc.) can and should be customized to
suit the needs of individual stakeholders wherever necessary and appropriate.

<!-- hr for vertical space -->
---

!!! example "Risk Tolerance Influences Response Priority"

- An organization with a high aversion to change risk might choose to accept more vulnerability risk by
Expand Down