security(gomod): 🛡️ patch 🛡️ vulnerability [unknown]

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4	v4.5.0 -> v4.5.1
golang.org/x/crypto	v0.24.0 -> v0.31.0
golang.org/x/net	v0.26.0 -> v0.33.0

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2024-51744

Summary

Unclear documentation of the error behavior in ParseWithClaims can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by ParseWithClaims return both error codes. If users only check for the jwt.ErrTokenExpired using error.Is, they will ignore the embedded jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid and thus potentially accept invalid tokens.

Fix

We have back-ported the error handling logic from the v5 branch to the v4 branch. In this logic, the ParseWithClaims function will immediately return in "dangerous" situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release.

Workaround

We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors ("dangerous" ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.

token, err := /* jwt.Parse or similar */
if token.Valid {
	fmt.Println("You look nice today")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenMalformed) {
	fmt.Println("That's not even a token")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenUnverifiable) {
	fmt.Println("We could not verify this token")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid) {
	fmt.Println("This token has an invalid signature")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenExpired) || errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenNotValidYet) {
	// Token is either expired or not active yet
	fmt.Println("Timing is everything")
} else {
	fmt.Println("Couldn't handle this token:", err)
}

---

Bad documentation of error handling in ParseWithClaims can lead to potentially dangerous situations

CVE-2024-51744 / GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r / GO-2024-3250

More information

Details

Summary

Unclear documentation of the error behavior in ParseWithClaims can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by ParseWithClaims return both error codes. If users only check for the jwt.ErrTokenExpired using error.Is, they will ignore the embedded jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid and thus potentially accept invalid tokens.

Fix

We have back-ported the error handling logic from the v5 branch to the v4 branch. In this logic, the ParseWithClaims function will immediately return in "dangerous" situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release.

Workaround

We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors ("dangerous" ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.

token, err := /* jwt.Parse or similar */
if token.Valid {
	fmt.Println("You look nice today")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenMalformed) {
	fmt.Println("That's not even a token")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenUnverifiable) {
	fmt.Println("We could not verify this token")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid) {
	fmt.Println("This token has an invalid signature")
} else if errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenExpired) || errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenNotValidYet) {
	// Token is either expired or not active yet
	fmt.Println("Timing is everything")
} else {
	fmt.Println("Couldn't handle this token:", err)
}

Severity

• CVSS Score: 3.1 / 10 (Low)
• Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

References

• https://github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/security/advisories/GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r
• https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-51744
• https://github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/commit/7b1c1c00a171c6c79bbdb40e4ce7d197060c1c2c
• https://github.com/golang-jwt/jwt

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

---

Improper error handling in ParseWithClaims and bad documentation may cause dangerous situations in github.com/golang-jwt/jwt

CVE-2024-51744 / GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r / GO-2024-3250

More information

Details

Improper error handling in ParseWithClaims and bad documentation may cause dangerous situations in github.com/golang-jwt/jwt

Severity

Unknown

References

• https://github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/security/advisories/GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r
• https://github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/commit/7b1c1c00a171c6c79bbdb40e4ce7d197060c1c2c

This data is provided by OSV and the Go Vulnerability Database (CC-BY 4.0).

CVE-2024-45337

Applications and libraries which misuse the ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback callback may be susceptible to an authorization bypass.

The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions.

For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key.

Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/[email protected] enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth.

Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance.

---

Misuse of ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback may cause authorization bypass in golang.org/x/crypto

CVE-2024-45337 / GHSA-v778-237x-gjrc / GO-2024-3321

More information

Details

Applications and libraries which misuse the ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback callback may be susceptible to an authorization bypass.

The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions.

For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key.

Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/[email protected] enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth.

Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance.

Severity

• CVSS Score: 9.1 / 10 (Critical)
• Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

References

• https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45337
• https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/b4f1988a35dee11ec3e05d6bf3e90b695fbd8909
• https://github.com/golang/crypto
• https://go.dev/cl/635315
• https://go.dev/issue/70779
• https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/-nPEi39gI4Q/m/cGVPJCqdAQAJ
• https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2024-3321
• http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/12/11/2

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

---

Misuse of ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback may cause authorization bypass in golang.org/x/crypto

CVE-2024-45337 / GHSA-v778-237x-gjrc / GO-2024-3321

More information

Details

Applications and libraries which misuse the ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback callback may be susceptible to an authorization bypass.

The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions.

For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key.

Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/cry...@​v0.31.0 enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth.

Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance.

Severity

Unknown

References

• https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/b4f1988a35dee11ec3e05d6bf3e90b695fbd8909
• https://go.dev/cl/635315
• https://go.dev/issue/70779
• https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/-nPEi39gI4Q/m/cGVPJCqdAQAJ

This data is provided by OSV and the Go Vulnerability Database (CC-BY 4.0).

CVE-2024-45338

An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service.

---

Non-linear parsing of case-insensitive content in golang.org/x/net/html

CVE-2024-45338 / GHSA-w32m-9786-jp63 / GO-2024-3333

More information

Details

An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service.

Severity

• CVSS Score: Unknown
• Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

• https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45338
• https://github.com/golang/go/issues/70906
• https://cs.opensource.google/go/x/net
• https://go.dev/cl/637536
• https://go.dev/issue/70906
• https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/wSCRmFnNmPA/m/Lvcd0mRMAwAJ
• https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2024-3333

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

---

Non-linear parsing of case-insensitive content in golang.org/x/net/html

CVE-2024-45338 / GHSA-w32m-9786-jp63 / GO-2024-3333

More information

Details

An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service.

Severity

Unknown

References

• https://go.dev/cl/637536
• https://go.dev/issue/70906
• https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/wSCRmFnNmPA/m/Lvcd0mRMAwAJ

This data is provided by OSV and the Go Vulnerability Database (CC-BY 4.0).

---

Release Notes

golang-jwt/jwt (github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4)

v4.5.1

Compare Source

Security

Unclear documentation of the error behavior in ParseWithClaims in <= 4.5.0 could lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by ParseWithClaims return both error codes. If users only check for the jwt.ErrTokenExpired using error.Is, they will ignore the embedded jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid and thus potentially accept invalid tokens.

This issue was documented in GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r and fixed in this release.

Note: v5 was not affected by this issue. So upgrading to this release version is also recommended.

What's Changed

• Back-ported error-handling logic in ParseWithClaims from v5 branch. This fixes GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r.

Full Changelog: golang-jwt/jwt@v4.5.0...v4.5.1

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.29%. Comparing base (a2521eb) to head (4df9846).
Report is 120 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #176      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   32.61%   25.29%   -7.32%     
==========================================
  Files          80       79       -1     
  Lines       10855    11088     +233     
==========================================
- Hits         3540     2805     -735     
- Misses       7027     8012     +985     
+ Partials      288      271      -17     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[renovate]

ℹ Artifact update notice

File name: go.mod

In order to perform the update(s) described in the table above, Renovate ran the go get command, which resulted in the following additional change(s):

• 4 additional dependencies were updated

Details:

Package	Change
golang.org/x/sys	v0.21.0 -> v0.28.0
golang.org/x/sync	v0.7.0 -> v0.10.0
golang.org/x/term	v0.21.0 -> v0.27.0
golang.org/x/text	v0.16.0 -> v0.21.0