-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #169: stepSize not updated when holding button #170
Draft
danshick
wants to merge
6
commits into
Eeems-Org:master
Choose a base branch
from
danshick:fix-169
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
45e226a
Fix #169: stepSize not updated when holding button
danshick 7741125
Move lastDirectionUp logic to BetterSpinBox
danshick d7f2fe2
Merge branch 'master' into fix-169
Eeems 9b7c870
Merge branch 'master' into fix-169
Eeems b95accb
Merge branch 'master' into fix-169
Eeems 81a9c56
Merge branch 'master' into fix-169
Eeems File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ideally this logic should be moved into BetterSpinBox, and it should only call the valueChanged signal if ignoreNextValueChange is false.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll have to fiddle with this one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For sure. Just for some more context for you, I intend to pull out a bunch of the widgets into their own widget library at some point, so I'd like to make as many of them fully self contained as I can before I do so.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It may be best to create a second signal. I'm thinking "valueStable"? It doesn't look like Javascript's
super
keyword will be any use here at all.Unfortunately, all of this can be overwritten if someone intuitively attempts to use the original
onValueChanged
signal.I'd be curious to hear your thoughts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or, we could just try to make
ignoreNextValueChange
an instance variable and not declare it in BetterSpinBox at all.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What you can do is make Item be the root of BetterSpinBox and then declare the signals/properties there and map them into the SpinBox. That way you'll have more control over when things are called.