Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2024-02-09] [$500] Task – Unable to change assignee twice when edit a task Offline #35574

Closed
3 of 6 tasks
lanitochka17 opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 18 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Comments

@lanitochka17
Copy link

lanitochka17 commented Feb 1, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 1.4.35-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/4262665
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

  1. Go to https://staging.new.expensify.com/
  2. Log in
  3. Create a task with assignee
  4. Open task details page and go Offline
  5. Change the assignee to another
  6. Change the assignee to another one more time

Expected Result:

Assignee from the step 6 is displayed

Actual Result:

Assignee from the step 5 is displayed. Unable to change assignee twice when edit a task Offline

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6363838_1706805779794.Unable_to_change_assignee_twice_when_edit_a_task_Offline.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01e8af7391b7bbb42a
  • Upwork Job ID: 1753172040869830656
  • Last Price Increase: 2024-02-01
  • Automatic offers:
    • mkhutornyi | Contributor | 28135627
Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @kadiealexander
@lanitochka17 lanitochka17 added the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Feb 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 1, 2024

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @grgia (Engineering), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

@mkhutornyi
Copy link
Contributor

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

Task – Unable to change assignee twice when edit a task Offline

What is the root cause of that problem?

{report.managerID ? (
<OfflineWithFeedback pendingAction={report.pendingFields?.managerID}>
<MenuItem
label={translate('task.assignee')}
title={ReportUtils.getDisplayNameForParticipant(report.managerID)}
icon={OptionsListUtils.getAvatarsForAccountIDs(report.managerID ? [report.managerID] : [], personalDetails)}

managerID is task assignee here but this component is not re-rendered whenever managerID is updated because of memoization below:
return (
oldProps.report.lastReadTime === newProps.report.lastReadTime &&
oldProps.report.reportID === newProps.report.reportID &&
oldProps.report.policyID === newProps.report.policyID &&
oldProps.report.lastVisibleActionCreated === newProps.report.lastVisibleActionCreated &&
oldProps.report.isOptimisticReport === newProps.report.isOptimisticReport &&
_.isEqual(oldProps.report.pendingFields, newProps.report.pendingFields)
);

memo(
ReportScreen,
(prevProps, nextProps) =>
prevProps.isSidebarLoaded === nextProps.isSidebarLoaded &&
_.isEqual(prevProps.reportActions, nextProps.reportActions) &&
_.isEqual(prevProps.reportMetadata, nextProps.reportMetadata) &&
prevProps.isComposerFullSize === nextProps.isComposerFullSize &&
_.isEqual(prevProps.betas, nextProps.betas) &&
_.isEqual(prevProps.policies, nextProps.policies) &&
prevProps.accountManagerReportID === nextProps.accountManagerReportID &&
prevProps.userLeavingStatus === nextProps.userLeavingStatus &&
prevProps.report.reportID === nextProps.report.reportID &&
prevProps.report.policyID === nextProps.report.policyID &&
prevProps.report.isOptimisticReport === nextProps.report.isOptimisticReport &&
prevProps.report.statusNum === nextProps.report.statusNum &&
_.isEqual(prevProps.report.pendingFields, nextProps.report.pendingFields) &&
prevProps.currentReportID === nextProps.currentReportID &&
prevProps.report.notificationPreference === nextProps.report.notificationPreference &&
prevProps.report.isPinned === nextProps.report.isPinned &&
prevProps.report.chatReportID === nextProps.report.chatReportID,
),

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

add report.managerID check in those 2 places

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Feb 1, 2024

@hurali97 it seems your PR #30168 may have caused this regression

Are you able to push a follow up or shall we test the above proposal?

cc @aimane-chnaif @mountiny

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Feb 1, 2024

@grgia I can help take over, indeed that is coming from the PR thank you for the heads up!

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Feb 1, 2024

@mkhutornyi are you able to raise the PR now? is $250 fine with you? The change is simple and same as in couple other fixes so adjusting price given the low complaxity

@mountiny mountiny self-assigned this Feb 1, 2024
@mkhutornyi
Copy link
Contributor

sure thanks

@mountiny mountiny added the External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor label Feb 1, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01e8af7391b7bbb42a

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title Task – Unable to change assignee twice when edit a task Offline [$500] Task – Unable to change assignee twice when edit a task Offline Feb 1, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Feb 1, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @aimane-chnaif (External)

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Feb 1, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 1, 2024

📣 @mkhutornyi 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app!

Offer link
Upwork job
Please accept the offer and leave a comment on the Github issue letting us know when we can expect a PR to be ready for review 🧑‍💻
Keep in mind: Code of Conduct | Contributing 📖

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Feb 1, 2024

@mkhutornyi please feel free to raise the PR!

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Feb 1, 2024

@mkhutornyi please ping me in slack when you have the PR ready!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Reviewing Has a PR in review and removed Hourly KSv2 labels Feb 1, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Weekly KSv2 label Feb 1, 2024
@francoisl francoisl removed the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Feb 2, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Feb 2, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [$500] Task – Unable to change assignee twice when edit a task Offline [HOLD for payment 2024-02-09] [$500] Task – Unable to change assignee twice when edit a task Offline Feb 2, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Feb 2, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 2, 2024

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 2, 2024

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.35-7 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-02-09. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Daily KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Feb 9, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 9, 2024

Issue is ready for payment but no BZ is assigned. @kadiealexander you are the lucky winner! Please verify the payment summary looks correct and complete the checklist. Thanks!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Feb 12, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 12, 2024

@mountiny, @grgia, @kadiealexander, @aimane-chnaif, @mkhutornyi Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

@kadiealexander
Copy link
Contributor

kadiealexander commented Feb 13, 2024

Sorry, was OOO! Payouts due:

Upwork job is here.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Feb 13, 2024
@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@kadiealexander please cancel my offer. No payment needed for me. Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants