-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#39005 - Polish items for Transfer owner flow #39035
Merged
luacmartins
merged 11 commits into
Expensify:main
from
burczu:bugfix/39005-polish-items-for-transfer-owner-flow
Mar 28, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b317e2d
switched to use of correct currency utility function
burczu cc3fb59
missing flags setting for add billing card action added
burczu b69dee8
unnecessary import removed
burczu e5b480d
issue with stale error messages shown for ms fixed
burczu 3279ebe
issue with glitching between transitions fixed
burczu b22a60f
unnecessary property removed
burczu cd5a60f
missing key for list added in the currency modal to highlight correctly
burczu 21a889a
state variable renamed
burczu e6f1c04
unnecessary default value removed
burczu ae4c645
lint and prettier
burczu 370c375
Merge branch 'main' into bugfix/39005-polish-items-for-transfer-owner…
burczu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this intended to have two useEffects here? 🤔 cc @luacmartins @burczu
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't think of a reason to have both, it seems like we can get rid of the first one without affecting functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@carlosmiceli I started investigating components that disable
react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
andreact-compiler/react-compiler
because of this comment. That's how I noticed this weird duplicate.I created a follow up issue to react-compiler upgrade PR, could you assign me to it? I don't want to spend too much time on this, but to fix some of obvious mistakes we have in the codebase. I could fix this one there too, let me know what do you think :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if you meant to tag @carlosmiceli, but I assigned you to the issue above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahh, sorry. I meant to tag you of course 🤦