Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: requires validate when opening bank account #49230

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

daledah
Copy link
Contributor

@daledah daledah commented Sep 15, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #48041
PROPOSAL: #48041 (comment)

Tests

  1. Login with a new Account
  2. Go to settings > wallet
  3. Verify that: Add bank account button is not disabled
  4. Click on Add bank account button
  5. Verify that: Validation page appears
  6. Click on Enable wallet button
  7. Verify that: Validation page appears
  8. Enter magic code
  9. Verify that: Enable wallet page appears.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Login with a new Account
  2. Go to settings > wallet
  3. Verify that: Add bank account button is not disabled
  4. Click on Add bank account button
  5. Verify that: Validation page appears
  6. Click on Enable wallet button
  7. Verify that: Validation page appears
  8. Enter magic code
  9. Verify that: Enable wallet page appears.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-09-18.at.18.10.51.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-09-18.at.18.12.56.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-09-18.at.23.29.02.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-09-18.at.23.30.55.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-09-18.at.17.48.10.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-09-18.at.23.31.26.mov

@daledah daledah marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2024 10:47
@daledah daledah requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 10:47
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from jjcoffee September 18, 2024 10:47
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 18, 2024

@jjcoffee Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team September 18, 2024 10:47
@daledah daledah marked this pull request as draft September 18, 2024 11:04
@daledah daledah marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2024 16:40
@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Sep 18, 2024

@hungvu193 I used the ValidateCodeForm that you added in #48628. Just one question: Why do we auto-remove the error when we have one in here:

useEffect(() => {
if (!validateError) {
return;
}
clearError();
// eslint-disable-next-line react-compiler/react-compiler, react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
}, [clearError, validateError]);

I see that in other places, we show the error after the modal is closed, but why don't we show the error directly in the form, so the user don't have to open the modal again?

@hungvu193
Copy link
Contributor

I see that in other places, we show the error after the modal is closed, but why don't we show the error directly in the form, so the user don't have to open the modal again?

Yeah, we have a plan to change that behavior in here, we should clear the error when modal is closed.

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Sep 19, 2024

@jjcoffee According to #49230 (comment), should we hold until #49270 is resolved until we can continue on this one? cc @hungvu193

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

should we hold until #49270 is resolved

@daledah Thanks for bringing that up! I don't think we need to hold on that since it doesn't affect the overall fix here.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

@daledah Didn't we agree to use ValidateCodeActionModal?

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Sep 19, 2024

@jjcoffee I tried using ValidateCodeActionModal in this commit but it ended up causing a lot of unexpected bugs, so I had to come back to the original solution.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

@daledah Following the flow Enable wallet -> Add bank account, I think I'd expect that once the validate code is entered we are immediately navigated to the next step, rather than having to click Add bank account again.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Sep 19, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android-app-2024-09-19_14.15.23.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-chrome-2024-09-19_14.17.18.mp4
iOS: Native
ios-app-2024-09-19_14.01.39.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-safari-2024-09-19_13.55.34.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
desktop-chrome-2024-09-19_14.04.03.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop-app-2024-09-19_14.12.43.mp4

@jjcoffee

This comment was marked as resolved.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Sep 19, 2024

Tagging @Expensify/design to take a look! Do we need to tag anyone else to review the copy?

@jjcoffee

This comment was marked as resolved.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Looks pretty good to me 👍

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Could have sworn I saw @dannymcclain leave some feedback in another PR that we could use some more spacing between the inputs and the "Didn't receive a code?" line:
CleanShot 2024-09-20 at 07 40 20@2x

Does that sound right?

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Sep 27, 2024

@jjcoffee Does this look good to you?

Screen.Recording.2024-09-27.at.12.19.17.mov

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me! Any thoughts on the updated flow @dannymcclain @dubielzyk-expensify?

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Oh I think that feels much better. Let's see what Jon thinks too!

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Yep, looks good. Send it!

Copy link
Contributor

@jjcoffee jjcoffee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from arosiclair September 30, 2024 09:28
src/pages/AddPersonalBankAccountPage.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/settings/Wallet/VerifyAccountPage.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Oct 1, 2024

@jjcoffee @arosiclair Looks like #47218 has implemented another add bank account button on Workspace invoices page. Should we keep current behavior on the button as well?

Video:

Screen.Recording.2024-10-01.at.10.57.07.mov

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Oct 1, 2024

Looks like #47218 has implemented another add bank account button on Workspace invoices page. Should we keep current behavior on the button as well?

It looks like that feature is in the process of being developed (it doesn't show up in the menu items yet), so I would say we shouldn't add it here yet. It also feels a bit janky to navigate back to the wallet page in the background as in your video, so we'd probably want to add this as a modal instead which would be out of scope of this particular issue. cc @arosiclair

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

It also feels a bit janky to navigate back to the wallet page in the background as in your video, so we'd probably want to add this as a modal instead which would be out of scope of this particular issue

Agree!

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Oct 2, 2024

@jjcoffee I updated. FYI, I left the new logic unchanged.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Oct 2, 2024

Over to you @arosiclair!

@arosiclair arosiclair merged commit 3946b22 into Expensify:main Oct 2, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 2, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2024

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.0.44-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 9.0.44-12 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ const CENTRAL_PANE_TO_RHP_MAPPING: Partial<Record<CentralPaneName, string[]>> =
SCREENS.SETTINGS.WALLET.CARD_ACTIVATE,
SCREENS.SETTINGS.WALLET.REPORT_VIRTUAL_CARD_FRAUD,
SCREENS.SETTINGS.WALLET.CARDS_DIGITAL_DETAILS_UPDATE_ADDRESS,
SCREENS.SETTINGS.WALLET.VERIFY_ACCOUNT,
SCREENS.SETTINGS.ADD_BANK_ACCOUNT,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coming from #50214 this caused an issue for Add bank account buttons that shouldn't show the settings page as the central pane.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants