added concept of expose_mut. reference to protected #2
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Eyob94 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 19 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new Continuous Integration (CI) workflow for GitHub Actions, modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/ci.yaml (1 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- src/lib.rs (11 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .gitignore
Additional comments not posted (3)
Cargo.toml (1)
10-11: Verify necessity and impact of Unix-specificlibcdependency.The addition of
libcunder Unix-specific dependencies is approved. However, verify if this is necessary given thatlibcmight already be included in general dependencies, and ensure there are no conflicts or redundant inclusions that could affect build configurations or cross-platform compatibility.Run the following script to verify the necessity and impact of the Unix-specific
libcdependency:Verification successful
Unix-specific
libcdependency inclusion is appropriate and conflict-free.The addition of
libcunder Unix-specific dependencies inCargo.tomlis consistent with its usage across the project. There are no conflicts or redundant inclusions, and the version is consistent. This inclusion likely serves platform-specific needs without affecting cross-platform compatibility. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the necessity and impact of the Unix-specific `libc` dependency. # Test: Search for `libc` usage across the project. Expect: No conflicts or redundant inclusions. rg --type toml -A 5 $'libc'Length of output: 641
.github/workflows/ci.yaml (1)
16-43: Verify matrix configuration in CI workflow.The CI workflow is well-structured and covers essential steps like build, check, clippy, doc, and test. However, the matrix is currently set to only include
windows-latest. If this is not intentional, consider adding other runners likeubuntu-latestandmacos-latestto ensure comprehensive testing across different platforms.Run the following script to verify the matrix configuration:
src/lib.rs (1)
Line range hint
12-354: Thoroughly review security implications of changes toSecretBox.The modifications to the
SecretBoxstruct, including the addition of executable memory protection (PROT_EXEC), simplification of thezeroizemethod, and new methods for exposing secrets, are significant and aim to enhance security. However, it's crucial to ensure that these changes do not introduce vulnerabilities, especially with the use ofPROT_EXEC. A thorough security review is recommended to assess the impact of these changes.Run the following script to perform a security review:
|
|
||
| impl<S: Zeroize> Drop for SecretBox<S> { | ||
| fn drop(&mut self) { | ||
| let len = size_of_val(&*self.inner_secret); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this the same as std::mem::size_of_val? It's not compiling on my computer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should be as it use mem. but add full path or remove and use again
| @@ -63,7 +61,7 @@ impl<S: Zeroize> From<Box<S>> for SecretBox<S> { | |||
| impl<S: Zeroize> SecretBox<S> { | |||
| /// Create a secret value using a pre-boxed value. | |||
| pub fn new(boxed_secret: Box<S>) -> Self { | |||
| let len = mem::size_of_val(&*boxed_secret); | |||
| let len = size_of_val(&*boxed_secret); | |||
|
I changed it to |
|
test fails for me too, don't know why
…On Sun, Sep 8, 2024, 21:28 Eyob ***@***.***> wrote:
I changed it to std::mem::size_of_val() but the tests are failing
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB5TC4AZ6CMD5EUX6V447X3ZVSJNFAVCNFSM6AAAAABN3AYJ4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMZWG44DAMJYGM>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
src/lib.rs (3)
29-35: Review error handling strategy indropmethod.The
dropmethod now panics ifmunlockfails, which is a change from previous error handling strategies that might have logged the error instead. This approach ensures that the failure is noticeable, but it could terminate the program in environments where such failures are recoverable. Consider whether this aligns with the overall error handling strategy of the application.
74-74: Validate the use ofexpose_secret_mutinnew_with_mut.Using
expose_secret_mutwithinnew_with_mutto initialize the secret directly is an innovative approach, but it exposes mutable references which could lead to data races or unintended modifications if not handled carefully. Ensure that this usage pattern is safe and well-documented to avoid misuse.
132-136: Review changes toexpose_secretandexpose_secret_mut.The modifications to
expose_secretandexpose_secret_mutmethods simplify the access to the inner secret without additional state management. This change enhances encapsulation but ensure that it does not inadvertently weaken the control over how secrets are accessed and modified.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/lib.rs (9 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
src/lib.rs (8)
23-23: Ensure proper zeroization of inner secret.The call to
zeroizeonself.inner_secret.as_mut()is crucial for ensuring that the secret data is properly erased from memory when no longer needed. This implementation appears correct as it directly calls thezeroizemethod on the mutable reference ofinner_secret.
110-111: Simplify the default constructor forSecretBox.The default constructor for
SecretBoxis effectively a wrapper around thenewmethod. This is a clean and consistent way to handle construction, ensuring that all instances ofSecretBoxare initialized in the same manner.
126-126: Ensure cloning does not compromise secret integrity.The implementation of
CloneforSecretBoxmust ensure that the cloning process does not inadvertently expose or duplicate sensitive information. Given thatSecretBox::newis used, which respects the security constraints, this implementation seems appropriate.
189-197: Approve the constructors forSecretGuardandSecretGuardMut.The new constructors for
SecretGuardandSecretGuardMutdirectly accept a reference to the secret, simplifying the creation process and reducing overhead. This is a clean and efficient way to handle these guards.
206-210: Clarify the role ofExposeSecrettrait.The
ExposeSecrettrait's methodsexpose_secretandexpose_secret_mutare clearly defined to handle immutable and mutable access respectively. This clarity is crucial for ensuring that the API is used correctly and securely.
145-145: Confirm correct implementation ofSecretGuardandSecretGuardMut.The addition of
datafields inSecretGuardandSecretGuardMutis a significant change that aligns with the modifications inexpose_secretandexpose_secret_mut. Ensure that these changes are reflected everywhere these guards are used to maintain consistency and prevent runtime errors.Also applies to: 164-164
Verification successful
Implementation of
SecretGuardandSecretGuardMutis consistent and correct.The
datafields inSecretGuardandSecretGuardMutare correctly initialized and used in theDerefandDerefMutimplementations. There are no additional usages outside ofsrc/lib.rs, ensuring consistency and preventing runtime errors.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `SecretGuard` and `SecretGuardMut` are used consistently with the new `data` fields. # Test: Search for all usages of `SecretGuard` and `SecretGuardMut` to ensure they are used correctly. rg --type rust -A 5 -B 5 'SecretGuard|SecretGuardMut'Length of output: 2820
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all usages of `SecretGuard` and `SecretGuardMut` across the codebase, including tests. rg --type rust 'SecretGuard|SecretGuardMut'Length of output: 972
54-66: Check the safety and necessity of manual memory management.The manual locking and unlocking of memory using
mlockandmunlockare critical for security but introduce complexity and potential for errors. Ensure that these operations are necessary for your use case and that they are correctly paired to prevent memory leaks or other security vulnerabilities.Verification successful
Manual memory management using
mlockandmunlockis necessary and correctly implemented.The use of
mlockandmunlockis critical for security, as indicated by the error handling withpanic!and the comment about the crate's purpose. These operations are correctly paired, ensuring that memory is locked and unlocked appropriately to prevent sensitive data from being swapped to disk.
- The
mlockandmunlockfunctions are used with error handling that panics if the operations fail, indicating their critical nature.- A comment in the code explains that the crate adds
mlockto lock the secret's page in memory, supporting the necessity of these operations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that mlock and munlock are correctly paired and necessary. # Test: Search for all occurrences of mlock and munlock to ensure they are paired. rg --type rust -A 3 -B 3 'mlock|munlock'Length of output: 1183
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for error handling and documentation related to mlock and munlock. # Test: Search for error handling around mlock and munlock. rg --type rust -A 5 -B 5 'mlock|munlock' | rg 'if|else|panic|unwrap|expect' # Test: Search for comments or documentation explaining the necessity of mlock and munlock. rg --type rust -A 3 -B 3 'mlock|munlock' | rg '//|/\*'Length of output: 630
248-248: Verify updated tests reflect the new logic correctly.The tests have been updated to reflect the changes in the
SecretBoxand related functionality. Ensure that these tests adequately cover the new logic, particularly the changes in how secrets are exposed and managed.Also applies to: 263-264, 273-273, 282-282
Verification successful
Tests Adequately Cover New Logic in
SecretBoxThe tests for the
SecretBoxstruct comprehensively cover its functionalities, including creation, mutation, and zeroization. The methods and trait implementations are well-represented in the tests, ensuring that the new logic is adequately tested.
- The tests
test_secret_box_drop_zeroizes,test_secret_box_expose_secret_mut,test_secret_box_new_with_ctr, andtest_secret_box_try_new_with_ctrcover the critical aspects ofSecretBox.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the tests cover the new logic adequately. # Test: Search for tests related to `SecretBox` and its methods to ensure comprehensive coverage. rg --type rust -A 10 -B 10 'test_secret_box'Length of output: 2199
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of the SecretBox class and its methods to verify test coverage. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'struct SecretBox { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'impl SecretBox { $$$ }'Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for the definition and implementation of the SecretBox struct and its methods. rg 'struct SecretBox' --type rust -A 10 rg 'impl SecretBox' --type rust -A 10Length of output: 433
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any functions or methods associated with SecretBox in the codebase. rg 'SecretBox<' --type rust -A 10Length of output: 4388
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/ci.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/ci.yaml
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
SecretBoxstruct.Chores
.gitignoreto exclude IDE-specific files, enhancing version control hygiene.