Introduce local_max_patches in domain
#293
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cburstedde
reviewed
Dec 14, 2023
Casting the process patch count at the earliest opportunity.
|
Thanks, I'd be fine if this gets merged! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is adding
local_max_patches, i.e. the maximum over all processes oflocal_num_patches, infclaw{2,3}d_domain_t. It is sufficient to set the value oflocal_max_patchesinfclaw2d_domain_newsince the adaption and partition function as all other domain creation functions infclaw2d_convenience.ccallfclaw2d_domain_new.The value of
local_max_patcheswill be required for planned changes regarding writing VTU files using MPI I/O.