-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add service to service guide #3411
Open
sixhobbits
wants to merge
37
commits into
FusionAuth:main
Choose a base branch
from
ritza-co:servicetoservice
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
qa: Service to service
qa: Service to service
Edit: Service-To-Service OAuth
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We had some questions while doing this one, as the introspect endpoint didn't work as we expected.
We posted this forum post and received some clarification on one point from @mooreds - but are still not clear if Fusionauth is implementing the introspect endpoint in a standard way, or we don't understand how to correctly use it.
The original draft of this article had the following paragraph which explains our understanding of what introspect should do and how it doesn't work that way in Fusionauth. We removed it as it's either a bug in Fusionauth or a misunderstanding on our part.
@mooreds maybe you have a quick insight here on the following as you responded on the forum before about the second point?
A Better Way To Verify A Token — Introspection
Verifying a token by manually looking at JWT signatures, as the code above does, is not standard in OAuth. Instead, all OAuth servers should allow anyone to verify a token by passing the token to the standard
introspect
endpoint. Example code to do this is given below.Unfortunately, FusionAuth does not implement this endpoint correctly. In the code above, you have to send the customer's secret key along with the token to be verified. But the server is the one that wants to verify the key, and the server doesn't have access to the customer's secrets. So the server can't verify any access tokens with this endpoint, as it should be able to. If you try passing the server's secret key to FusionAuth it doesn't work either.