Make e2e test generator workflow reusable

[danswick]

The new workflow I created with #2569 was not actually reusable and broke dev deploys. This should hopefully fix that.

PR checklist: submitters

• Link to an issue if possible. If there’s no issue, describe what your branch does. Even if there is an issue, a brief description in the PR is still useful.
• List any special steps reviewers have to follow to test the PR. For example, adding a local environment variable, creating a local test file, etc.
• For extra credit, submit a screen recording like this one.
• Make sure you’ve merged main into your branch shortly before creating the PR. (You should also be merging main into your branch regularly during development.)
• Make sure you’ve accounted for any migrations. When you’re about to create the PR, bring up the application locally and then run git status | grep migrations. If there are any results, you probably need to add them to the branch for the PR. Your PR should have only one new migration file for each of the component apps, except in rare circumstances; you may need to delete some and re-run python manage.py makemigrations to reduce the number to one. (Also, unless in exceptional circumstances, your PR should not delete any migration files.)
• Make sure that whatever feature you’re adding has tests that cover the feature. This includes test coverage to make sure that the previous workflow still works, if applicable.
• Make sure the full-submission.cy.js Cypress test passes, if applicable.
• Do manual testing locally. Our tests are not good enough yet to allow us to skip this step. If that’s not applicable for some reason, check this box.
• Verify that no Git surgery was necessary, or, if it was necessary at any point, repeat the testing after it’s finished.
• Once a PR is merged, keep an eye on it until it’s deployed to dev, and do enough testing on dev to verify that it deployed successfully, the feature works as expected, and the happy path for the broad feature area (such as submission) still works.

PR checklist: reviewers

• Pull the branch to your local environment and run make docker-clean; make docker-first-run && docker compose up; then run docker compose exec web /bin/bash -c "python manage.py test"
• Manually test out the changes locally, or check this box to verify that it wasn’t applicable in this case.
• Check that the PR has appropriate tests. Look out for changes in HTML/JS/JSON Schema logic that may need to be captured in Python tests even though the logic isn’t in Python.
• Verify that no Git surgery is necessary at any point (such as during a merge party), or, if it was, repeat the testing after it’s finished.

The larger the PR, the stricter we should be about these points.

[github-actions]

Terraform plan for dev

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.dev.module.database.cloudfoundry_service_instance.rds,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/dev.database/database/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "rds":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

(and 2 more similar warnings elsewhere)

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #307

[github-actions]

Terraform plan for meta

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.s3-backups.cloudfoundry_service_instance.bucket,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/s3-backups/s3/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "bucket":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #307

[danswick]

choice isn't supported for workflow_call for some reason, but someone would have to add this job to the prod deploy workflow for it to run there.

[github-actions]

File	Coverage		Missing
All files	86%	❌
api/serializers.py	88%	❌	177-178 183 188
api/test_views.py	96%	✅	105
api/uei.py	87%	❌	17-18 87 119-120 164 168-169
api/views.py	97%	✅	196-197 204-205 226 362-363
audit/forms.py	47%	❌	22-29 142-149
audit/intake_to_dissemination.py	92%	✅	67-68 201-207 257
audit/models.py	86%	❌	57 59 64 66 213 246 419 437-438 446 468 544-545 549 557 566 572
audit/test_commands.py	87%	❌
audit/test_mixins.py	90%	✅	112-113 117-119 184-185 189-191
audit/test_validators.py	95%	✅	436 440 608-609 848 855 862 869
audit/test_workbooks_should_fail.py	85%	❌	56 83-84 88
audit/test_workbooks_should_pass.py	90%	✅	56 81
audit/utils.py	70%	❌	13 21 33-35 38
audit/validators.py	94%	✅	137 189 288-289 304-305 486-490 495-499 515-524
audit/views.py	42%	❌	87-108 131-132 206-207 252-253 264-265 267-271 318-331 334-348 353-366 383-389 394-414 441-445 450-479 522-526 531-551 578-582 587-616 659-663 668-680 683-693 698-710 737-738 743-792 795-835 838-855
audit/cross_validation/additional_ueis.py	93%	✅	33
audit/cross_validation/check_award_ref_declaration.py	90%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_award_reference_uniqueness.py	93%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_certifying_contacts.py	87%	❌
audit/cross_validation/check_findings_count_consistency.py	91%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_cap.py	90%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_findings_text.py	90%	✅
audit/cross_validation/errors.py	78%	❌	30 69
audit/cross_validation/naming.py	68%	❌	178-182
audit/cross_validation/submission_progress_check.py	92%	✅	62 79
audit/cross_validation/tribal_data_sharing_consent.py	81%	❌	33 36 40
audit/cross_validation/validate_general_information.py	93%	✅	28-29
audit/fixtures/single_audit_checklist.py	55%	❌	146-183 229-238
audit/intakelib/exceptions.py	71%	❌	7-9 12
audit/intakelib/intermediate_representation.py	94%	✅	23-24 87 125 158 182-185
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings.py	97%	✅	51
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings_text.py	97%	✅	51
audit/intakelib/mapping_federal_awards.py	93%	✅	95
audit/intakelib/mapping_util.py	40%	❌	28 32 36 70-99 104 124-135 142-158 162-167 171-185 190 195-215 220-237 258 263-264 273-279 289 304 309
audit/intakelib/checks/check_all_unique_award_numbers.py	79%	❌	24
audit/intakelib/checks/check_aln_three_digit_extension_pattern.py	73%	❌	27 36
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cardinality_of_passthrough_names_and_ids.py	91%	✅
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cluster_name_always_present.py	82%	❌	21
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cluster_total.py	87%	❌	46
audit/intakelib/checks/check_federal_award_passed_always_present.py	82%	❌	18
audit/intakelib/checks/check_findings_grid_validation.py	84%	❌	57
audit/intakelib/checks/check_is_a_workbook.py	68%	❌	16
audit/intakelib/checks/check_loan_guarantee.py	90%	✅	51
audit/intakelib/checks/check_look_for_empty_rows.py	91%	✅	18
audit/intakelib/checks/check_missing_award_numbers.py	72%	❌	16 22-23
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_major_program_no_type.py	72%	❌	22 31 40
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_repeat_findings.py	76%	❌	17 26
audit/intakelib/checks/check_other_cluster_names.py	81%	❌	24 34
audit/intakelib/checks/check_passthrough_name_when_no_direct.py	88%	❌	9 47
audit/intakelib/checks/check_sequential_award_numbers.py	76%	❌	14 22
audit/intakelib/checks/check_start_and_end_rows_of_all_columns_are_same.py	89%	❌	14
audit/intakelib/checks/check_state_cluster_names.py	65%	❌	23-24 34
audit/intakelib/checks/check_uei_exists.py	65%	❌	17-18
audit/intakelib/checks/runners.py	90%	✅	120 126
audit/intakelib/checks/util.py	84%	❌	16 33 38
audit/management/commands/load_fixtures.py	46%	❌	39-45
audit/viewlib/submission_progress_view.py	89%	❌	111 171-172
audit/viewlib/tribal_data_consent.py	34%	❌	23-41 44-79
audit/viewlib/upload_report_view.py	26%	❌	32-35 44 91-117 120-170 178-209
cms/views.py	57%	❌	11-16 29-30
config/urls.py	71%	❌	87
dissemination/models.py	99%	✅	460
dissemination/migrations/0002_general_fac_accepted_date.py	47%	❌	10-12
djangooidc/backends.py	78%	❌	32 57-63
djangooidc/exceptions.py	66%	❌	19 21 23 28
djangooidc/oidc.py	16%	❌	32-35 45-51 64-70 92-149 153-199 203-226 230-275 280-281 286
djangooidc/views.py	80%	❌	22 43 114
djangooidc/tests/common.py	96%	✅
report_submission/forms.py	92%	✅	35
report_submission/views.py	76%	❌	83 215-216 218 240-241 260-261 287-396 399-409
report_submission/templatetags/get_attr.py	76%	❌	8 11-14 18
support/admin.py	88%	❌	76 79 84 91-97 100-102
support/cog_over.py	90%	✅	30-33 86 93 145
support/signals.py	66%	❌	23-24 33-34
support/test_cog_over.py	98%	✅	134-135 224
support/management/commands/seed_cog_baseline.py	98%	✅	20-21
tools/update_program_data.py	89%	❌	96
users/auth.py	95%	✅	40-41
users/models.py	97%	✅	51-52
users/fixtures/user_fixtures.py	91%	✅

Minimum allowed coverage is 90%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against d4c7849