Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2023-11-14 | MAIN --> PROD | DEV (4ff2ff3) --> STAGING #2795

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023
Merged

2023-11-14 | MAIN --> PROD | DEV (4ff2ff3) --> STAGING #2795

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023

Conversation

jadudm
Copy link
Contributor

@jadudm jadudm commented Nov 14, 2023

This is an auto-generated pull request to merge main into prod for a staging release on 2023-11-14 with the last commit being merged as 4ff2ff3

purvinptl and others added 2 commits November 13, 2023 22:29
* bump eslint-config-prettier, prettier, esbuild

* bump eslint-config pretter as downstream dep

* bump cypress

* bump glob

* bump postcss

* test lighthouse temp report storage

* more lighthouse tests

* esbuild

* prettier 3.1

* reset some test files

---------

Co-authored-by: home <[email protected]>
@jadudm jadudm added autogenerated Automated pull request creation automerge Used for automated deployments labels Nov 14, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 14, 2023

Terraform plan for staging

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.staging.module.database.cloudfoundry_service_instance.rds,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/staging.database/database/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "rds":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

(and 2 more similar warnings elsewhere)

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Staging Environment #87

Copy link
Contributor

Terraform plan for production

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.domain.cloudfoundry_service_instance.external_domain_instance,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/domain/domain/main.tf line 45, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "external_domain_instance":
  45:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

(and 3 more similar warnings elsewhere)

📝 Plan generated in Pull Request Checks #1641

Copy link
Contributor

File Coverage Missing
All files 86%
api/serializers.py 88% 177-178 183 188
api/test_views.py 95% 103
api/uei.py 88% 87 118-119 163 167-168
api/views.py 98% 195-196 334-335
audit/file_downloads.py 73% 35-53 81-83
audit/forms.py 47% 22-29 142-149
audit/intake_to_dissemination.py 92% 67-68 201-207 257
audit/test_commands.py 87%
audit/test_mixins.py 90% 112-113 117-119 184-185 189-191
audit/test_validators.py 95% 436 440 608-609 848 855 862 869
audit/test_views.py 95% 410-442 451-482 491-519
audit/test_workbooks_should_fail.py 88% 56 83-84 88
audit/test_workbooks_should_pass.py 90% 56 81
audit/utils.py 70% 13 21 33-35 38
audit/validators.py 92% 137 189 283-292 299-308 486-490 495-499 515-524
audit/views.py 31% 90-111 134-135 209-210 255-256 267-268 270-274 321-334 337-351 356-369 386-392 397-417 420-448 453-482 485-529 534-554 557-585 590-619 622-666 671-683 686-696 701-713 740-741 746-795 798-838 841-858
audit/cross_validation/additional_ueis.py 93% 33
audit/cross_validation/check_award_ref_declaration.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/check_award_reference_uniqueness.py 93%
audit/cross_validation/check_certifying_contacts.py 87%
audit/cross_validation/check_findings_count_consistency.py 91%
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_cap.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_findings_text.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/errors.py 78% 30 69
audit/cross_validation/naming.py 93% 182
audit/cross_validation/submission_progress_check.py 95% 79
audit/cross_validation/tribal_data_sharing_consent.py 81% 33 36 40
audit/cross_validation/validate_general_information.py 93% 28-29
audit/fixtures/single_audit_checklist.py 55% 146-183 229-238
audit/intakelib/exceptions.py 71% 7-9 12
audit/intakelib/intermediate_representation.py 91% 27-28 73 91 129 162 200-203 212-213
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings.py 97% 53
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings_text.py 97% 52
audit/intakelib/mapping_federal_awards.py 93% 95
audit/intakelib/mapping_util.py 81% 21 25 29 99 104-105 114-120 130 145 150
audit/intakelib/checks/check_all_unique_award_numbers.py 79% 24
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cardinality_of_passthrough_names_and_ids.py 91%
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cluster_total.py 85% 49 65
audit/intakelib/checks/check_finding_prior_references_pattern.py 73% 33 43-44
audit/intakelib/checks/check_findings_grid_validation.py 84% 58
audit/intakelib/checks/check_has_all_the_named_ranges.py 84% 52
audit/intakelib/checks/check_is_a_workbook.py 69% 20
audit/intakelib/checks/check_loan_balance_entries.py 78% 22 39-40
audit/intakelib/checks/check_loan_balance_present.py 76% 27 36
audit/intakelib/checks/check_look_for_empty_rows.py 91% 18
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_major_program_no_type.py 76% 18 27
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_repeat_findings.py 76% 21 30
audit/intakelib/checks/check_other_cluster_names.py 81% 24 34
audit/intakelib/checks/check_passthrough_name_when_no_direct.py 88% 9 47
audit/intakelib/checks/check_sequential_award_numbers.py 76% 14 22
audit/intakelib/checks/check_show_ir.py 70% 8-14
audit/intakelib/checks/check_start_and_end_rows_of_all_columns_are_same.py 89% 14
audit/intakelib/checks/check_state_cluster_names.py 65% 23-24 34
audit/intakelib/checks/check_version_number.py 73% 21 31-32
audit/intakelib/checks/runners.py 95% 129
audit/intakelib/common/util.py 89% 21 38
audit/intakelib/transforms/xform_reformat_prior_references.py 55% 12-17
audit/intakelib/transforms/xform_rename_additional_notes_sheet.py 81% 14
audit/management/commands/load_fixtures.py 46% 39-45
audit/models/models.py 82% 57 59 64 66 216 228-231 249 422 440-441 449 471 560-561 565 573 582 588
audit/viewlib/submission_progress_view.py 89% 111 171-172
audit/viewlib/tribal_data_consent.py 34% 23-41 44-79
audit/viewlib/unlock_after_certification.py 57% 28-47 69-83
audit/viewlib/upload_report_view.py 26% 32-35 44 91-117 120-170 178-209
config/urls.py 71% 83
dissemination/models.py 99% 460
dissemination/search.py 51% 19 69-97 104-114
dissemination/views.py 62% 29-31 34-92 159 161 163
dissemination/migrations/0002_general_fac_accepted_date.py 47% 10-12
djangooidc/backends.py 78% 32 57-63
djangooidc/exceptions.py 66% 19 21 23 28
djangooidc/oidc.py 16% 32-35 45-51 64-70 92-149 153-199 203-226 230-275 280-281 286
djangooidc/views.py 80% 22 43 114
djangooidc/tests/common.py 96%
report_submission/forms.py 92% 35
report_submission/views.py 76% 83 215-216 218 240-241 260-261 287-396 399-409
report_submission/templatetags/get_attr.py 76% 8 11-14 18
support/admin.py 88% 76 79 84 91-97 100-102
support/cog_over.py 91% 30-33 93 145
support/models.py 89% 103-104
support/test_cog_over.py 98% 134-135 224
support/management/commands/seed_cog_baseline.py 98% 20-21
tools/update_program_data.py 89% 96
users/auth.py 95% 43-44
users/models.py 97% 51-52
users/fixtures/user_fixtures.py 91%

Minimum allowed coverage is 85%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against 4ff2ff3

@jadudm jadudm merged commit fe85c06 into prod Nov 14, 2023
40 of 41 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autogenerated Automated pull request creation automerge Used for automated deployments
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants