Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modules refactoring #913

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

Modules refactoring #913

merged 19 commits into from
Nov 13, 2023

Conversation

aleksandar-apostolov
Copy link
Collaborator

Goal: Reduce overall complexity and consolidate modules.
——————
Action:
“stream-video-android-tooling” - merge with dogfooding,
Reason:
Only used there and the code consists of only one debugging activity and a utility function to create “toasts”.
——————
Actions:
“stream-video-android-model” - move into “core” under a model package name.
“stream-video-android-datastore” - move into “core” under a ‘datastore’ package name. If StreamUserDataStore was interface, I would suggest having the interface in core and implementation maybe in separate module.
Reason:
The question I asked to suggest these moves -> Can core be used without datastore / model? If no, then merge the modules. Unless someone wants to use the UI artefacts without the core modules. But current setup doesn’t allow for this.
——————
Actions:
Rename “stream-video-android-xml” to “stream-video-android-ui-xml”
Rename “stream-vdeio-android-compose” to “stream-video-android-ui-compose”
Rename “stream-video-android-ui-common” to “stream-video-android-ui-core”
Reason:
Better clarity on the dependencies between UI modules and what each contains.
——————
Action:
Rename “stream-video-android-mock” to “stream-video-android-ui-previewdata”
Reason:
Only one test uses the “mock” its called BaseComposeTest. The rest usage is into @Preview composable in dogfooding, app and compose modules. Thus the name mock makes no sense.
——————
Action:
“Dogfooding” should became “app” and maybe configure based on flavour if ever.
Reason:
“app” seems to not have reason to exist.
——————

@aleksandar-apostolov aleksandar-apostolov marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2023 13:51
@aleksandar-apostolov aleksandar-apostolov requested a review from a team as a code owner November 10, 2023 13:51
Copy link
Member

@skydoves skydoves left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Let me follow up generating baseline profiles once this PR is merged.

@aleksandar-apostolov aleksandar-apostolov merged commit 358215c into develop Nov 13, 2023
6 checks passed
@aleksandar-apostolov aleksandar-apostolov deleted the modules_refactoring branch November 13, 2023 06:57
workspace added a commit to workspace/google-meet-clone-compose that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants