fix: pre-built timer worker #1617
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
myandrienko
commented
Dec 11, 2024
| if (opts?.expertimental_enableTimerWorker) enableTimerWorker(); | ||
| if (opts?.enableTimerWorker) enableTimerWorker(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oops, it used to say "expertimental" the whole time!..
oliverlaz
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dropping the
experimental_prefix since this feature was confirmed working.Since the timer worker (introduced in #1557) is not going to be updated too often, we can skip an additional built step and just check in the prebuilt worker.
The "source" file
worker.tsand the script to generate worker are still there, but they are not used during build.