Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete ProtocolUTxOCostPerByteFeature #340

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2023

Conversation

newhoggy
Copy link
Collaborator

@newhoggy newhoggy commented Oct 24, 2023

Changelog

- description: |
    Delete `ProtocolUTxOCostPerByteFeature`
# uncomment types applicable to the change:
  type:
  # - feature        # introduces a new feature
  - breaking       # the API has changed in a breaking way
  # - compatible     # the API has changed but is non-breaking
  # - optimisation   # measurable performance improvements
  # - improvement    # QoL changes e.g. refactoring
  # - bugfix         # fixes a defect
  # - test           # fixes/modifies tests
  # - maintenance    # not directly related to the code
  # - release        # related to a new release preparation
  # - documentation  # change in code docs, haddocks...

Context

Stray feature pretending to be an eon. Directly use the eon instead.

How to trust this PR

Highlight important bits of the PR that will make the review faster. If there are commands the reviewer can run to observe the new behavior, describe them.

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • New tests are added if needed and existing tests are updated. See Running tests for more details
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@newhoggy newhoggy marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2023 11:00
@newhoggy newhoggy added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 25, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit f2ab681 Oct 25, 2023
22 of 24 checks passed
@newhoggy newhoggy deleted the newhoggy/delete-ProtocolUTxOCostPerByteFeature branch October 25, 2023 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants