Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump lodash and babel-eslint #46

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 30, 2022

Bumps lodash to 4.17.21 and updates ancestor dependency babel-eslint. These dependencies need to be updated together.

Updates lodash from 3.10.1 to 4.17.21

Release notes

Sourced from lodash's releases.

4.0.0

lodash v4.0.0

2015 was big year! Lodash became the most depended on npm package, passed 1 billion downloads, & its v3 release saw massive adoption!

The year was also one of collaboration, as discussions began on merging Lodash & Underscore. Much of Lodash v4 is proofing out the ideas from those discussions. Lodash v4 would not be possible without the collaboration & contributions of the Underscore core team. In the spirit of merging our teams have blended with several members contributing to both libraries.

For 2016 & lodash v4.0.0 we wanted to cut loose, push forward, & take things up a notch!

Modern only

With v4 we’re breaking free from old projects, old environments, & dropping old IE < 9 support!

4 kB Core

Lodash’s kitchen-sink size will continue to grow as new methods & functionality are added. However, we now offer a 4 kB (gzipped) core build that’s compatible with Backbone v1.2.4 for folks who want Lodash without lugging around the kitchen sink.

More ES6

We’ve continued to embrace ES6 with methods like _.isSymbol, added support for cloning & comparing array buffers, maps, sets, & symbols, converting iterators to arrays, & iterable _(…).

In addition, we’ve published an es-build & pulled babel-plugin-lodash into core to make tree-shaking a breeze.

More Modular

Pop quiz! 📣

What category path does the bindAll method belong to? Is it

A) require('lodash/function/bindAll') B) require('lodash/utility/bindAll') C) require('lodash/util/bindAll')

Don’t know? Well, with v4 it doesn’t matter because now module paths are as simple as

var bindAll = require('lodash/bindAll');

We’ve also reduced module complexity making it easier to create smaller bundles. This has helped Lodash adoption with libraries like Async & Redux!

1st Class FP

With v3 we introduced lodash-fp. We learned a lot & with v4 we decided to pull it into core.

Now you can get immutable, auto-curried, iteratee-first, data-last methods as simply as

var _ = require('lodash/fp');
var object = { 'a': 1 };
</tr></table> 

... (truncated)

Commits
  • f299b52 Bump to v4.17.21
  • c4847eb Improve performance of toNumber, trim and trimEnd on large input strings
  • 3469357 Prevent command injection through _.template's variable option
  • ded9bc6 Bump to v4.17.20.
  • 63150ef Documentation fixes.
  • 00f0f62 test.js: Remove trailing comma.
  • 846e434 Temporarily use a custom fork of lodash-cli.
  • 5d046f3 Re-enable Travis tests on 4.17 branch.
  • aa816b3 Remove /npm-package.
  • d7fbc52 Bump to v4.17.19
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view
Maintainer changes

This version was pushed to npm by bnjmnt4n, a new releaser for lodash since your current version.


Updates babel-eslint from 4.1.8 to 10.1.0

Release notes

Sourced from babel-eslint's releases.

v10.1.0

v10.0.3

Fixes babel/babel-eslint#791, also eslint/eslint#12117

Some context: babel/babel-eslint#793

We ended up going with @​JLHwung's PR babel/babel-eslint#794 which uses ESLint's deps instead of going with peerDeps since it really depends on the version being used and we don't want users to have to install it directly on their own.

babel-eslint is patching patches of the dependencies of ESLint itself so these kinds of issues have happened in the past. We'll need to look into figuring out how to have a more solid way of modifying behavior instead of this monkeypatching type of thing for future releases.

v10.0.2

Fixes babel/babel-eslint#772

v10.0.1

The TypeAlias "conversion" to a function has issues. Sounds like we need to rethink the change, most likely we can just actually change the scoping rather than hardcode an AST change.

v10.0.0

Small breaking change: add a peerDependency starting from the ESLint version that added a parser feature that we were monkeypatching before (and drop that code). If already using ESLint 5 shouldn't be any different.

/* @flow */
type Node<T> = { head: T; tail: Node<T> }
// or
type File = {chunks: Array<Chunk>}
type Chunk = {file: File}

v9.0.0

We've released v7: https://twitter.com/left_pad/status/1034204330352500736, so this just updates babel-eslint to use those versions internally. That in itself doesn't break anything but:

  • Babel now supports the new decorators proposal by default, so we need to switch between the new and the old proposal. This is a breaking change.

To enable the legacy decorators proposal users should add a specific parser option:

{
</tr></table> 

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language

You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

Bumps [lodash](https://github.com/lodash/lodash) to 4.17.21 and updates ancestor dependency [babel-eslint](https://github.com/babel/babel-eslint). These dependencies need to be updated together.


Updates `lodash` from 3.10.1 to 4.17.21
- [Release notes](https://github.com/lodash/lodash/releases)
- [Commits](lodash/lodash@3.10.1...4.17.21)

Updates `babel-eslint` from 4.1.8 to 10.1.0
- [Release notes](https://github.com/babel/babel-eslint/releases)
- [Commits](babel/babel-eslint@v4.1.8...v10.1.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: lodash
  dependency-type: indirect
- dependency-name: babel-eslint
  dependency-type: direct:development
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Oct 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants