Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ConvergenceException from StatsBase #20

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ararslan
Copy link
Member

I've added the folks who contributed the type and improvements to it and its documentation as coauthors of the commit. (Apologies if I missed anyone.) I've made only very minor adjustments from its definition in StatsBase.

I've added the folks who contributed the type and improvements to it and
its documentation as coauthors of the commit. (Apologies if I missed
anyone.)

Co-authored-by: Roger Herikstad <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Galen Lynch <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Morley <[email protected]>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 13, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #20 (6a1063d) into main (14e0ba7) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #20   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines           36        49   +13     
=========================================
+ Hits            36        49   +13     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/statisticalmodel.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@ararslan
Copy link
Member Author

Bump @nalimilan, any thoughts on this?

@nalimilan
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the delay. Looks good, I just wonder where we should draw the line regarding what to add to StatsAPI. While this is supposed to be mainly an interface package, we already added a few methods for statistical models, and this PR adds a few more. Probably OK, but we should stop at some point. :-)

Can you also bump the version?

@ararslan
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry for the delay

No worries 🙂

I just wonder where we should draw the line regarding what to add to StatsAPI

Perhaps worth determining what the precise scope of the package is before adding more random stuff to it. 😅 I guess this addition is a bit of an outlier amidst the rest of the functionality in that everything else is either a stub definition or a sensible fallback definition atop which more specific methods can be defined. This, on the other hand, is a piece of completely self-contained functionality that won't be extended, only used. So perhaps it makes sense to just keep it in StatsBase.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants