feat(ci): add codespeedHQ performance analysis🐇

[KarelZe]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (412f246) 99.24% compared to head (e269c0e) 99.27%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #81      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.24%   99.27%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines         266      277      +11     
  Branches       28       48      +20     
==========================================
+ Hits          264      275      +11     
  Partials        2        2              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Congrats! CodSpeed is installed 🎉

🆕 20 new benchmarks were detected.

You will start to see performance impacts in the reports once the benchmarks are run from your default branch.

Detected benchmarks

• test_tick_rule[all] (60 ms)
• test_trade_size (61.5 ms)
• test_rev_tick_rule[ex] (59.6 ms)
• test_rev_tick_rule[all] (59.7 ms)
• test_rev_clnv[best] (121.3 ms)
• test_rev_lr[best] (80.4 ms)
• test_quote_rule[best] (71 ms)
• test_depth (82.3 ms)
• test_rev_emo[ex] (84.5 ms)
• test_quote_rule[ex] (71.1 ms)
• test_rev_emo[best] (84.5 ms)
• test_emo[best] (84.6 ms)
• test_lr[ex] (79.7 ms)
• test_clnv[best] (121.2 ms)
• test_emo[ex] (84.5 ms)
• test_lr[best] (79.7 ms)
• test_rev_lr[ex] (80.4 ms)
• test_rev_clnv[ex] (121.3 ms)
• test_tick_rule[ex] (59.6 ms)
• test_clnv[ex] (121.2 ms)

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud