Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v2] payments inabox #991

Merged
merged 43 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

[v2] payments inabox #991

merged 43 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

hopeyen
Copy link
Contributor

@hopeyen hopeyen commented Dec 12, 2024

Why are these changes needed?

enabling inabox with payments

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, in that case, please comment that they are not relevant.
  • I've checked the new test coverage and the coverage percentage didn't drop.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Integration tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

@hopeyen hopeyen changed the title temp: uncomment payment construction [v2] payments inabox Dec 12, 2024
@hopeyen hopeyen force-pushed the hope/payments-v2-inabox branch 23 times, most recently from 1bf965f to d69ffc2 Compare December 14, 2024 04:40
@hopeyen hopeyen changed the base branch from master to hope/new-payments-contract December 14, 2024 04:40
@hopeyen hopeyen force-pushed the hope/payments-v2-inabox branch 4 times, most recently from f9ec220 to 7c67725 Compare December 14, 2024 18:28
Base automatically changed from hope/new-payments-contract to master December 16, 2024 18:42
@hopeyen hopeyen force-pushed the hope/payments-v2-inabox branch from 1a5854f to ea6fe9b Compare December 20, 2024 03:20
@hopeyen hopeyen merged commit 6059c6a into master Dec 20, 2024
10 checks passed
@hopeyen hopeyen deleted the hope/payments-v2-inabox branch December 20, 2024 03:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants