-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add RMC to the muon stop pileup capture products, and add a test script #368
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hi @michaelmackenzie,
which require these tests: build. @Mu2e/fnalbuild-users, @Mu2e/write have access to CI actions on main. ⌛ The following tests have been triggered for 3e49a75: build (Build queue is empty) |
☀️ The build tests passed at 3e49a75.
N.B. These results were obtained from a build of this Pull Request at 3e49a75 after being merged into the base branch at 2b61d64. For more information, please check the job page here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the quick response! I have some basic questions. Also note that this change won't affect existing MDC2020 output, we would need to remake the pileup stream and rerun mixing for it to have an effect. It would be useful to have a comparison of the output before/after this change.
@@ -54,6 +54,19 @@ physics : { | |||
spectrumShape: "flat" | |||
} | |||
tool_type: "MuCapPhotonGenerator" | |||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This configuration is for 'external', does that mean it generates photons? Is that redundant with the flat spectrum above?
What about internal conversion? Should there be a 2nd tool instance for that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we would need to have a second tool in the list for internal conversions. I can add this as well if this makes sense to you. Its rate will be reduced by 0.0069 with respect to the real photons for reference. I can also consider updating the RMC generator tool to randomly generate internal instead of external conversions at this relative rate if this makes more sense.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 5:45 AM michaelmackenzie ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In JobConfig/pileup/MuStopPileup.fcl
<#368 (comment)>:
> @@ -54,6 +54,19 @@ physics : {
spectrumShape: "flat"
}
tool_type: "MuCapPhotonGenerator"
+ },
Yes, we would need to have a second tool in the list for internal
conversions. I can add this as well if this makes sense to you. Its rate
will be reduced by 0.0069 with respect to the real photons for reference. I
can also consider updating the RMC generator tool to randomly generate
internal instead of external conversions at this relative rate if this
makes more sense.
I think we should be generating both internally converted (e+e- pairs) and
real photons. Only having 1 seems physically inconsistent. Whether that's 1
tool or 2 is an implementation detail and best left to your expertise. But
either way, the common physics components should be synchronized.
… —
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#368 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAH572KIE2HMCYBSGCO7HL2BXPXNAVCNFSM6AAAAABSFQJI3KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZDINJRGQ2TIOBSGU>
.
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
--
David Brown ***@***.***
Office Phone (510) 486-7261
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
M/S 50R5008 (50-6026C) Berkeley, CA 94720
|
📝 The HEAD of |
I updated the Offline PR to include internal conversions randomly selected using the internal conversion branching fraction (measured for RPC). This now generates external and internal conversions at their expected rates with one tool entry in the capture products list, naturally keeping the spectra synchronized given any updates. I tested generating muon stop pileup to see that RMC is added at the expected rate (I saw 2 events with 20k generated stops) as well as that the internal conversions are generated at the expected rate (I increased the overall RMC rate for this test due to the low expected rate). Are there any other tests you would suggest running? |
Add RMC the list of muon stop pileup capture products. The RMC rate for aluminum is 1.4e-5 for E > 57 MeV over the closure approximation spectrum fraction for E > 57 MeV (~1/10,000 muon captures). This is in connection to Offline PR 1375.