-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
CCPP Framework Meeting Minutes 2020 04 02
Dom Heinzeller edited this page Apr 2, 2020
·
12 revisions
Agenda
- Discussion with NRL team
- Proposal Add suite keyword to suite definition file? https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-framework/issues/275
"Tour de cap_gen.py
"
- introduction of a post-analysis database dump
- database contains a lot of information about the run
- from the command line, via a Python interface, or via a new inspection routine
- what is needed to transition GFS physics to
cap_gen.py
- handle blocked data structures for the different stages (init, run, ...)
- GFS data types
- stricter requirements in
cap_gen.py
(order of arguments, compare Fortran code and metadata,horizontal_dimension
versushorizontal_loop_extent
)
- additional features to be developed in the near future
- advanced diagnostics (accumulating, averaging, ...)
- CCPP physics schemes are usable by both
ccpp_prebuild.py
andcap_gen.py
as-is (butcap_gen.py
is stricter checking for the requirements, see above)
Proposal Add suite keyword to suite definition file? https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-framework/issues/275
- will it make it easier or create problems elsewhere
- Dom's opinion is to keep
cap_gen.py
as easy as possible - is this a tradeoff to holding back good development? Please think about it and comment on the issue
Collaboration with NRL on SCM and on GPU/NUOPC caps
- three areas identified for collaboration: variable information exchange between CCPP and host model, SCM, rejected GPU-NUOPC cap proposal
- best way to go forward: transfer funds from NRL to NCAR, or assist development at NRL?
- implementing another vertical advection scheme (spectral element vertical advection scheme) in SCM should be relatively straightforward; NRL would like to get started on this at some point this quarter (Q2/2020)
- GPU-NUOPC cap SIP proposal
- NEPTUNE will be GPU enabled in the future, MPAS already is
- John's work on coordinate-independent code