Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[12.0][MIG] stock_pack_operation_auto_fill > stock_move_line_auto_fill #538

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from

Conversation

jarroyomorales
Copy link

Migration to 12.0

@rousseldenis rousseldenis added this to the 12.0 milestone Jun 24, 2019
@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jarroyomorales. Thanks for this.

As the model name has changed (and also the model description), it's better to rename it stock_move_line_auto_fill (with a migration script).

I saw the remark here :
#457

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2019
34 tasks
@jarroyomorales
Copy link
Author

Hi @rousseldenis ,
I just changed the name and the description and added the rename in OpenUpgrade.
OCA/OpenUpgrade#1898
Is there anything else that needs to be done?

Copy link

@HaraldPanten HaraldPanten left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional review 👍

@kittiu
Copy link
Member

kittiu commented Jun 26, 2019

Functional tested LGTM

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza changed the title [12.0][MIG] stock_pack_operation_auto_fill [12.0][MIG] stock_pack_operation_auto_fill > stock_move_line_auto_fill Jul 12, 2019
Copy link
Member

@bealdav bealdav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

An UI improvement as suggestion

IMP mv_line_auto_fill: pick type UI
@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

@bealdav @pedrobaeza @kittiu Could you update your review ?

Copy link
Member

@bealdav bealdav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My suggestion merged.
Works in production

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot merge

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Rebased to 12.0-ocabot-merge-pr-538-by-pedrobaeza-bump-no, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2019
Signed-off-by pedrobaeza
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at e2e3ce8. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

PS: Don't worry if GitHub says there are unmerged commits: it is due to a rebase before merge. All commits of this PR have been merged into 12.0.

@rafaelbn
Copy link
Member

We should clarify @sergio-teruel if this FIX is needed here in v12 #546

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.