-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 193
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[16.0][MIG] stock_warehouse_flow: Migration to 16.0 #704
[16.0][MIG] stock_warehouse_flow: Migration to 16.0 #704
Conversation
test do not pass, this #707 is necessary before |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technical review
55f1a62
to
d78cf73
Compare
Add this fix #705 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functional validation
LGTM
https://www.awesomescreenshot.com/video/19771910?key=4864abd489cf337b68d79215091357ab
New feature allowing to re-qualify the operation type of a stock move at confirmation. The main criteria to requalify a move is the carrier, as this one often implies a dedicated routing (we do not have the same flow, nor the same carrier, depending if we ship a pallet or a bunch of products for instance). This job was previously done by configuring the stock_dynamic_routing with a domain on the carrier, but the dynamic routing was applied on reservation, while we could already qualify moves at confirmation.
The glue module `stock_warehouse_flow_release` is here to ensure the compatibility.
Just have the function return the same kind of recordset for every return statement
Add an error raising if there are routing flows but none are matched with the `move_domain` on the flow.
This allows to configure a split_method simple on a flow by setting also the split_qty the move get split before the apply Also if a flow is marked as simple split, it only applies on moves where the move product_qty >= split_qty
d78cf73
to
7e48298
Compare
/ocabot merge nobump |
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
Thank you @RodrigoBM |
You are welcome. |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 180da63. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
#461