Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

requirements: use libhtp 0.5.x #10239

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jasonish
Copy link
Member

Move to libhtp to the 0.5.x branch instead of 0.5.45.

Move to libhtp to the 0.5.x branch instead of 0.5.45.
@jasonish jasonish requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2024 20:48
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (3cb7112) 82.18% compared to head (02ad890) 82.25%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10239      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.18%   82.25%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         977      977              
  Lines      271894   271947      +53     
==========================================
+ Hits       223465   223679     +214     
+ Misses      48429    48268     -161     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 63.31% <ø> (+0.33%) ⬆️
suricata-verify 61.50% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 62.82% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

This will need to be back ported, right ?

@victorjulien victorjulien added this to the 8.0 milestone Jan 25, 2024
@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

This will need to be back ported, right ?

Indeed

@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Merged in #10244, thanks!

@jasonish jasonish deleted the requires-libhtp-master/v1 branch August 15, 2024 16:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants