Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

next/653/20241202/v1 #12202

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jasonish and others added 5 commits December 2, 2024 12:33
For example, "requires: foo bar" is an unknown requirement, however
its not tracked, nor an error as it follows the syntax. Instead,
record these unknown keywords, and fail the requirements check if any
are present.

A future version of Suricata may have new requires keywords, for
example a check for keywords.

Ticket: OISF#7418
To be used by the requires keyword to check for keyword support.

Ticket: OISF#7403
For example:

    requires: keyword foo;

Will require that Suricata supports the "foo" keyword.

Ticket: OISF#7403
Bumps [codecov/codecov-action](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action) from 4.6.0 to 5.0.7.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](codecov/codecov-action@b9fd7d1...015f24e)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: codecov/codecov-action
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 3.27.0 to 3.27.5.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@v3.27.0...v3.27.5)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@jufajardini jufajardini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jasonish
Copy link
Member

jasonish commented Dec 2, 2024

Consistent with listed PRs...

Is this expected? https://github.com/OISF/suricata/actions/runs/12075846358/job/33676317373#step:24:839

I thought that would have been fixed with #12171, perhaps some generated code needs to be fixed up. Its unrelated to this PR, so I woudln't let it hold this up, and I'll look into right away.

Copy link
Member

@jasonish jasonish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, assuming CI passes.

@jasonish
Copy link
Member

jasonish commented Dec 2, 2024

Consistent with listed PRs...
Is this expected? https://github.com/OISF/suricata/actions/runs/12075846358/job/33676317373#step:24:839

I thought that would have been fixed with #12171, perhaps some generated code needs to be fixed up. Its unrelated to this PR, so I woudln't let it hold this up, and I'll look into right away.

Wait, that's from another build. Its is not expected anymore.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.74468% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.17%. Comparing base (ae10fc3) to head (e9173f3).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #12202   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.16%   83.17%           
=======================================
  Files         912      912           
  Lines      257066   257111   +45     
=======================================
+ Hits       213797   213856   +59     
+ Misses      43269    43255   -14     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 61.01% <34.61%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
livemode 19.41% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pcap 44.38% <0.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 62.77% <73.07%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
unittests 59.18% <68.08%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

WARNING:

field baseline test %
SURI_TLPR1_stats_chk
.app_layer.flow.dcerpc_tcp 40 42 105.0%

Pipeline 23629

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants