Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Detect log alert tx one 7199 - v8 #12243

Closed

Conversation

jufajardini
Copy link
Contributor

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7199
Also solves https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7350

May also solve https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7406

Follow up on @catenacyber work - #12197
just to adjust the terminology we're trying to agree upon

Describe changes:

  • use guess-applayer-tx and similar terminology throughout to keep everything tied:
    • config
    • log
    • code

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2168

Ticket: 7199

Uses a config parameter detect.force-applayer-findtx to enable
this behavior (off by default)

This feature is requested for use cases with signatures not
using app-layer keywords but still targetting application
layer transactions, such as pass/drop rule combination,
or lua usage.

This overrides the previous behavior of checking if the signature
has a content match, by checking if there is only one live
transaction, in addition to the config parameter being set.
to better reflect their true meaning
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.19%. Comparing base (a9b36d8) to head (6f201e2).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #12243      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.18%   83.19%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         912      912              
  Lines      257174   257183       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits       213930   213969      +39     
+ Misses      43244    43214      -30     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 61.01% <76.19%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
livemode 19.41% <28.57%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pcap 44.36% <76.19%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 62.79% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 59.18% <52.38%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 23716

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Replaced by #12255

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants