add opslevel_check_code_issue

[davidbloss]

Resolves #

Problem

Solution

Checklist

• I have run this code, and it appears to resolve the stated issue.
• This PR does not reduce total test coverage
• This PR has no user interface changes or has already received approval from product management to change the interface.
• Make a changie entry that explains the customer facing outcome of this change

[rocktavious]

shouldn't we be federating this to NewCheckCodeBaseResourceModel ?

[rocktavious]

Couple of changes and then maybe can we add 1 or 2 examples so they show up on the docs?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 219 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 0.23%. Comparing base (ef57486) to head (5eed1ac).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
opslevel/resource_opslevel_check_code_issue.go	0.00%	196 Missing ⚠️
opslevel/resource_opslevel_check_base.go	0.00%	19 Missing ⚠️
...l/resource_opslevel_check_git_branch_protection.go	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
opslevel/provider.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            main    #523      +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage   0.23%   0.23%   -0.01%     
========================================
  Files         81      85       +4     
  Lines       9352    9547     +195     
========================================
  Hits          22      22              
- Misses      9327    9522     +195     
  Partials       3       3              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rocktavious]

LGTM