You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
First, the server application has to be started as it provides ressources like sounds, maps and textures which are required for "offline" modes, too.
As I cound not manage to include the tracks inside the compiled JAR archive, the `tracks` directory has to be located at the same folder where the `server.jar` is located!
As I cound not manage to include the tracks inside the compiled JAR archive, the `tracks` directory has to be located at the same folder where the `server.jar` is located! There is a symbolic link in the `server/` directory which will likely not work on Windows systems. Please remove it and copy the directory instead!
Assuming that all 3 tools have compiled sucessfully (or downloaded them them from the [Releases Page](https://github.com/PhilippvK/playforia-minigolf/releases)), you have 3 possible ways for running the server binary:
1. Using the IntelliJ IDE: Use the provides build artifacts or run the server by pressing the play button after compiling
2. Using the Ant tool: Run `ant run` in the `./server` directory
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I fact I was already thinking over this.
Having this links in the repo makes it more difficult for others to contribute stuff. On the other hand, I spend >10h per week working on improvements, so I would like to give others the chance to appreciate it...
Which option would you prefer or do have a better idea:
Revert the funding stuff to what it was before
Create a section in the README, where all contributors are shown, where I can but my link
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not an answer, but another question:
What was your intention when asking forkers to explicitly remove your donation link from their forks? 🤔 I never saw such a request and thus am curious about your thoughts.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, it is probably mostly because I want to avoid misconceptions where someone is not aware of the fact that they are not supporting the GitHub User/Contributor of the actual fork.
86dde7bThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your funding stuff from readme are missing since merge from my repository
86dde7bThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I fact I was already thinking over this.
Having this links in the repo makes it more difficult for others to contribute stuff. On the other hand, I spend >10h per week working on improvements, so I would like to give others the chance to appreciate it...
Which option would you prefer or do have a better idea:
86dde7bThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not an answer, but another question:
What was your intention when asking forkers to explicitly remove your donation link from their forks? 🤔 I never saw such a request and thus am curious about your thoughts.
86dde7bThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, it is probably mostly because I want to avoid misconceptions where someone is not aware of the fact that they are not supporting the GitHub User/Contributor of the actual fork.