Webflow V2 migration #14734
Webflow V2 migration #14734
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request involves significant updates to the Webflow integration, transitioning from the older Webflow API to the new v2 API. Several action modules have been removed, including those for getting and publishing orders. New modules have been introduced, and existing ones have been refactored to align with the new API structure. The changes include updates to method calls, property definitions, and the introduction of new functionalities, such as webhook management and enhanced order processing capabilities. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Hello everyone, I have tested this PR and there're some test cases failed or needed improvement. Please check the test report below for more information |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 30
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (27)
components/webflow_v2/actions/list-sites/list-sites.mjs (3)
7-7: Consider using semantic versioning instead of timestampsUsing
"0.0.{{ts}}"for versioning might make it difficult to track specific versions and their changes. Consider using semantic versioning (e.g., "0.1.0") to better reflect the component's lifecycle and changes.- version: "0.0.{{ts}}", + version: "0.1.0",
Line range hint
12-17: Add error handling and response validationThe current implementation should include error handling and validate the response structure, as V2 API responses might differ from V1.
async run({ $ }) { - const response = await this.app.listSites(); + try { + const response = await this.app.listSites(); + + if (!Array.isArray(response)) { + throw new Error('Unexpected response format from Webflow V2 API'); + } + + $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.length} sites`); + return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to list sites: ${error.message}`); + } - $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved sites"); - - return response; },
Webhook triggers needed for site-related events
Based on the verification results:
- The Webflow v2 component currently lacks webhook trigger implementations (no
sourcesdirectory exists)- The app has webhook support methods (
createWebhook,removeWebhook) but no corresponding trigger sources- The component only has action implementations for site operations
The component requires webhook trigger implementations for site-related events to align with the PR objectives. This should be implemented in a new
sourcesdirectory.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-17: Verify webhook trigger requirementsAccording to the PR objectives, several webhook triggers need to be implemented. Please verify if this component requires corresponding webhook triggers for site-related events.
Let me search specifically for Webflow webhook triggers and site-related events.
Let me check if there are any existing webhook trigger implementations for Webflow sites.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for webhook trigger implementations echo "Searching for webhook trigger implementations..." fd -e mjs -e js . | grep -i "webhook\|trigger" | while read -r file; do echo "=== $file ===" rg -A 5 "site.*trigger|trigger.*site" "$file" || true doneLength of output: 36158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Webflow webhook sources and triggers echo "=== Searching for Webflow webhook sources ===" fd -e mjs . components/webflow_v2/sources/ echo -e "\n=== Searching for site-related webhook patterns in Webflow component ===" rg -i "site.*webhook|webhook.*site" components/webflow_v2/ -A 5Length of output: 1354
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for existing webhook trigger implementations in Webflow component echo "=== Searching for webhook trigger implementations in Webflow component ===" fd -e mjs . components/webflow_v2/ | while read -r file; do echo "=== $file ===" rg -A 5 "type.*source|trigger.*type|webhook.*trigger" "$file" || true done echo -e "\n=== Checking for source directory structure ===" ls -la components/webflow_v2/sources/ 2>/dev/null || echo "No sources directory found"Length of output: 6598
components/webflow_v2/package.json (1)
3-3: Consider using version 1.0.0 for the initial V2 releaseGiven this is a major migration with breaking changes from V1 to V2 APIs, consider following semantic versioning principles and starting with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.1.0.
- "version": "0.1.0", + "version": "1.0.0",components/webflow_v2/actions/get-site/get-site.mjs (1)
Line range hint
1-24: Consider adding error handlingThe component should include proper error handling for API failures, rate limits, and authentication issues which might be different in V2.
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.app.getSite(this.siteId); $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved site"); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to get site: ${error.message}`); + } },components/webflow_v2/actions/list-collections/list-collections.mjs (1)
Line range hint
18-23: Consider enhancing the response handlingWhile the basic functionality is correct, consider these improvements:
- Make the success message more informative by including the number of collections retrieved
- Add specific error handling for V2 API errors
async run({ $ }) { const response = await this.app.listCollections(this.siteId); - $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved collections"); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.length} collections`); + if (response.length === 0) { + $.export("$summary", "No collections found for this site"); + } return response; },components/webflow_v2/actions/refund-order/refund-order.mjs (1)
Line range hint
24-29: Enhance error handling and success messageConsider the following improvements:
- Add try-catch block with specific error handling for common V2 API errors
- Include order ID in the success message for better traceability
async run({ $ }) { - const response = await this.app.refundOrder(this.siteId, this.orderId); - $.export("$summary", "Successfully refunded order"); + try { + const response = await this.app.refundOrder(this.siteId, this.orderId); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully refunded order ${this.orderId}`); + return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to refund order: ${error.message}`); + } - return response; },components/webflow_v2/actions/unfulfill-order/unfulfill-order.mjs (1)
Line range hint
24-30: Consider enhancing the success message and error handling.While the implementation is cleaner, consider these improvements:
- Make the success message more informative by including the order ID
- Add specific error handling for V2 API errors
async run({ $ }) { const response = await this.app.unfulfillOrder(this.siteId, this.orderId); - $.export("$summary", "Successfully unfulfilled order"); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully unfulfilled order ${this.orderId}`); return response; },components/webflow_v2/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs (1)
9-23: Consider adding prop validationsThe props structure is correct, but consider adding these improvements:
- Add
required: truefor bothsiteIdandorderId- Add
descriptionfields to provide context for each propsiteId: { propDefinition: [ app, "sites", ], + required: true, + description: "The ID of the site containing the order", }, orderId: { propDefinition: [ app, "orders", ], + required: true, + description: "The ID of the order to retrieve", },components/webflow_v2/actions/get-collection/get-collection.mjs (2)
Line range hint
10-24: Consider adding input validation for site and collection IDsWhile the props are correctly migrated to use the new app module, there's no explicit validation of the site and collection IDs before making the API call. Given this is a V2 migration, the ID formats or requirements might have changed.
Consider adding validation before the API call:
props: { app, siteId: { propDefinition: [ app, "sites", ], + validate: (value) => { + if (!/^[a-f0-9]{24}$/.test(value)) { + throw new Error("Invalid site ID format"); + } + }, }, collectionId: { propDefinition: [ app, "collections", (c) => ({ siteId: c.siteId, }), ], + validate: (value) => { + if (!/^[a-f0-9]{24}$/.test(value)) { + throw new Error("Invalid collection ID format"); + } + }, }, },
Line range hint
28-32: Enhance error handling and response validationThe V2 API response structure might differ from V1. The current implementation doesn't handle potential API errors or validate the response structure.
Consider adding error handling and response validation:
async run({ $ }) { - const response = await this.app.getCollection(this.collectionId); + try { + const response = await this.app.getCollection(this.collectionId); + + // Validate response structure + if (!response || !response.id) { + throw new Error("Invalid collection response from Webflow V2 API"); + } + + $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved collection ${response.id}`); + return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to get collection: ${error.message}`); + } - $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved collection"); - return response; },components/webflow_v2/actions/list-orders/list-orders.mjs (2)
8-8: Consider using a fixed version number instead of a template string.Using
"0.0.{{ts}}"for versioning might cause issues with deterministic builds and version tracking. Consider using a fixed semantic version number that can be bumped during releases.- version: "0.0.{{ts}}", + version: "0.0.1",
30-30: Add null check in summary message.The current implementation might throw an error if the response is undefined.
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response?.length} orders`); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response?.length ?? 0} orders`);components/webflow_v2/actions/fulfill-order/fulfill-order.mjs (1)
31-32: Fix object destructuring formattingThe implementation looks good but needs minor formatting adjustments.
- const { app, siteId, orderId, ...data } = this; + const { + app, + siteId, + orderId, + ...data + } = this;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 31-31: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 31-31: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
components/webflow_v2/actions/get-collection-item/get-collection-item.mjs (2)
7-7: Consider using semantic versioning instead of timestampsUsing timestamps (
0.0.{{ts}}) for versioning may make it difficult to track API compatibility and changes. Consider adopting semantic versioning (e.g., "0.1.0") to better communicate breaking changes and updates.- version: "0.0.{{ts}}", + version: "0.1.0",
Line range hint
36-42: Add error handling and improve success messageThe current implementation could benefit from:
- Proper error handling for API failures
- A more descriptive success message including the collection/item IDs
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.app.getCollectionItem(this.collectionId, this.itemId); - $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved collection item"); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved item ${this.itemId} from collection ${this.collectionId}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to retrieve collection item: ${error.message}`); + } },components/webflow_v2/actions/get-item-inventory/get-item-inventory.mjs (2)
Line range hint
10-34: Consider adding input validation for required fieldsWhile the prop definitions maintain proper dependencies, consider adding validation to ensure non-empty values for critical fields like
siteId,collectionId, anditemId.props: { app, siteId: { propDefinition: [ app, "sites", ], + optional: false, }, collectionId: { propDefinition: [ app, "collections", (c) => ({ siteId: c.siteId, }), ], + optional: false, }, itemId: { propDefinition: [ app, "items", (c) => ({ collectionId: c.collectionId, }), ], + optional: false, }, },
Line range hint
36-41: Add error handling and improve response documentationThe current implementation needs:
- Proper error handling for API failures
- More informative success message including item details
- Documentation for the expected response structure
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.app.getCollectionItemInventory(this.collectionId, this.itemId); - $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved item inventory"); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved inventory for item ${this.itemId}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to retrieve item inventory: ${error.message}`); + } },components/webflow_v2/actions/delete-collection-item/delete-collection-item.mjs (3)
7-7: Consider using semantic versioning instead of timestampsThe dynamic version template
"0.0.{{ts}}"might make it difficult to track and manage versions effectively. Consider using semantic versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH) to better reflect the nature of changes.- version: "0.0.{{ts}}", + version: "1.0.0",
37-38: Fix object destructuring formattingAddress the linting errors by adding line breaks in the object destructuring.
- const { collectionId, itemId } = this; + const { + collectionId, + itemId, + } = this;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 37-37: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 37-37: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
Line range hint
1-43: Consider gradual migration strategySince this is part of the V1 to V2 migration with a January 2025 deadline, consider implementing feature flags or a parallel running strategy where both V1 and V2 implementations can coexist during the transition period. This would allow for:
- Gradual migration of customers
- Easy rollback if issues are discovered
- A/B testing to verify V2 behavior matches V1
components/webflow_v2/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs (2)
Line range hint
28-41: Consider adding validation for shipping fieldsThe shipping-related fields (
shippingProviderandshippingTracking) could benefit from additional validation:
shippingProvidermight need a predefined list of valid providersshippingTrackingmight need format validation based on the providerWould you like me to provide an example implementation with validation?
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 43-43: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 43-43: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
43-43: Improve destructuring readabilityApply line breaks as suggested by ESLint for better readability.
- const { app, siteId, orderId, ...data } = this; + const { + app, + siteId, + orderId, + ...data + } = this;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 43-43: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 43-43: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
components/webflow_v2/actions/update-item-inventory/update-item-inventory.mjs (2)
60-61: Remove unused variablesiteIdThe
siteIdvariable is destructured but not used in therunmethod. It's better to remove unused variables to keep the code clean and avoid suppressing linter warnings.Apply this diff to remove the unused variable and the ESLint directive:
const { app, - // eslint-disable-next-line no-unused-vars - siteId, collectionId, itemId, ...data } = this;
67-67: Implement error handling for the API callConsider adding a try-catch block around the API call to handle potential errors gracefully. This ensures that any issues are caught and appropriate error messages are provided.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
async run({ $ }) { this.validate(); const { app, collectionId, itemId, ...data } = this; - const response = await app.updateCollectionItemInventory(collectionId, itemId, data); + let response; + try { + response = await app.updateCollectionItemInventory(collectionId, itemId, data); + $.export("$summary", "Successfully updated item inventory"); + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to update item inventory: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } return response; },components/webflow_v2/actions/update-collection-item/update-collection-item.mjs (1)
78-79: Allow updatingisArchivedandisDraftstatusesCurrently,
isArchivedandisDraftare hardcoded tofalse. To provide more flexibility, consider allowing users to set these statuses through action props.You can modify the props to include
isArchivedandisDraftoptions:props: { app, // ... existing props + isArchived: { + type: "boolean", + label: "Is Archived", + description: "Set to true to archive the item.", + optional: true, + }, + isDraft: { + type: "boolean", + label: "Is Draft", + description: "Set to true to mark the item as a draft.", + optional: true, + }, },Then, update the
runmethod to use these values:const response = await app.updateCollectionItem(collectionId, itemId, { - isArchived: false, - isDraft: false, + isArchived: this.isArchived || false, + isDraft: this.isDraft || false, fieldData: { ...customFields, name: name || item.name, slug: slug || item.slug, }, });This change enhances the action's functionality by allowing users to control the archival and draft status of the collection items.
components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs (1)
79-83: Consider reusing the API client instanceYou create a new
WebflowClientinstance every timewebflowClient()is called. Consider creating and storing a single instance to reuse it, which can improve performance.Example:
webflowClient() { - return new WebflowClient({ + if (!this._client) { + this._client = new WebflowClient({ accessToken: this._authToken(), - }); + }); + } + return this._client; },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
components/webflow/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs(0 hunks)components/webflow/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs(0 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/create-collection-item/create-collection-item.mjs(2 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/delete-collection-item/delete-collection-item.mjs(3 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/fulfill-order/fulfill-order.mjs(2 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/get-collection-item/get-collection-item.mjs(3 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/get-collection/get-collection.mjs(2 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/get-item-inventory/get-item-inventory.mjs(3 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/get-site/get-site.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/list-collection-items/list-collection-items.mjs(2 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/list-collections/list-collections.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/list-orders/list-orders.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/list-sites/list-sites.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/refund-order/refund-order.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/unfulfill-order/unfulfill-order.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/update-collection-item/update-collection-item.mjs(5 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/update-item-inventory/update-item-inventory.mjs(3 hunks)components/webflow_v2/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs(2 hunks)components/webflow_v2/package.json(2 hunks)components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/webflow/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs
- components/webflow/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
components/webflow_v2/actions/create-collection-item/create-collection-item.mjs
[error] 68-68: 'fields' is not defined.
(no-undef)
components/webflow_v2/actions/delete-collection-item/delete-collection-item.mjs
[error] 37-37: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 37-37: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
components/webflow_v2/actions/fulfill-order/fulfill-order.mjs
[error] 31-31: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 31-31: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
components/webflow_v2/actions/list-orders/list-orders.mjs
[error] 27-27: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 27-27: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
components/webflow_v2/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs
[error] 28-28: 'siteId' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 28-28: 'domains' is not defined.
(no-undef)
components/webflow_v2/actions/update-collection-item/update-collection-item.mjs
[error] 13-13: A linebreak is required after '['.
(array-bracket-newline)
[error] 13-13: There should be a linebreak after this element.
(array-element-newline)
[error] 13-13: A linebreak is required before ']'.
(array-bracket-newline)
components/webflow_v2/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs
[error] 43-43: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 43-43: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs
[error] 109-110: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
[error] 111-111: Expected indentation of 6 spaces but found 5.
(indent)
[error] 114-114: Expected indentation of 6 spaces but found 5.
(indent)
[error] 115-115: Expected indentation of 6 spaces but found 5.
(indent)
[error] 163-164: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
[error] 164-165: Missing semicolon.
(semi)
[error] 177-178: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
🔇 Additional comments (37)
components/webflow_v2/actions/list-sites/list-sites.mjs (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement correctly updated for V2
The import statement properly references the new V2 app module, maintaining consistency with the migration objectives.
components/webflow_v2/package.json (1)
12-15: Verify dependency versions for security and compatibility
Let's verify the versions of the dependencies:
- webflow-api is pinned to 2.4.2
- @pipedream/platform allows minor version updates with ^3.0.3
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results from the shell scripts, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information:
Dependencies are up-to-date and secure
The current dependency versions are aligned with the latest available releases:
- [email protected] is the latest version
- @pipedream/[email protected] is the latest version
No security vulnerabilities were found in the GitHub Advisory Database for these packages.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest versions and security advisories for dependencies
# Check NPM for latest versions
echo "Checking latest versions..."
npm view webflow-api version
npm view @pipedream/platform version
# Check for known vulnerabilities
echo "Checking for vulnerabilities..."
npm audit --package-lock-only <<EOF
{
"dependencies": {
"@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3",
"webflow-api": "2.4.2"
}
}
EOF
# Check GitHub Advisory Database
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "webflow-api") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 945
components/webflow_v2/actions/get-site/get-site.mjs (3)
1-1: Verify component versioning strategy
The component uses a dynamic version string 0.0.{{ts}}. While this allows for automatic version increments, it might make it harder to track specific versions during the V1 to V2 migration period.
Let's check if this versioning pattern is consistent across other V2 components:
Also applies to: 4-4, 7-7
✅ Verification successful
Dynamic versioning pattern is consistent across V2 components
The dynamic version string 0.0.{{ts}} is consistently used across almost all Webflow V2 components, with only one exception in update-item-inventory.mjs which uses a static version 0.0.5. This versioning pattern appears to be an intentional strategy for the V2 migration, allowing for automatic version increments across components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version patterns across V2 components
# Expected: Consistent use of dynamic versioning
rg -g "webflow_v2/**/*.{mjs,js}" 'version:.*".*"' -A 1
Length of output: 205
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find version patterns
# First, let's verify the directory structure
fd . components/webflow_v2/
# Then search for version patterns in the found files
fd . components/webflow_v2/ -t f -e mjs -e js --exec grep -l "version:" {} \; | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
grep -A 1 "version:" "$file"
done
Length of output: 7922
10-16: Verify prop definitions migration
The siteId prop now references the new app module. Let's ensure the sites propDefinition exists in the V2 app module.
✅ Verification successful
The sites propDefinition exists and is properly implemented in V2
The verification confirms that the sites propDefinition is correctly implemented in the V2 app module (components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs). It includes the necessary label, description, type, and an async options function that fetches and formats site data. The implementation is complete and functional.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the sites propDefinition in the V2 app module
# Expected: Should find the propDefinition implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'sites: {
$$$
}' webflow_v2.app.mjs
Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct path to the app file
fd -t f "webflow.*app.*" -E "*.test.*"
# Then search for prop definitions related to sites
rg -l "sites.*propDefinition" --type js
Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Now that we found the correct path, let's check the content of the V2 app file
# for any sites-related properties or methods
rg -A 5 "sites" components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs
# Also check for any prop definitions in general
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
$$$
}' components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs
Length of output: 1180
Line range hint 19-23: Verify API response handling
The V2 API might return a different response structure compared to V1. We should verify that the response is handled correctly and that all necessary data is available.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results from previous scripts, I can now generate a final response:
The V2 API response handling appears to be properly implemented
The code shows that the V2 implementation uses a proper client abstraction through webflowClient().sites.get(siteId), which is consistent with modern API client patterns. The response is directly returned without transformation, which is appropriate because:
- The V2 client is properly initialized and scoped to handle site operations
- The implementation follows the same pattern as other successful V2 endpoints (like
listSites) - The direct response pass-through allows consumers to access all site data fields
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for response handling patterns across V2 components
# Expected: Consistent response handling
# Search for getSite usage and response handling
rg -g "webflow_v2/**/*.{mjs,js}" 'getSite.*response' -B 2 -A 5
Length of output: 213
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search pattern and check the implementation
rg -g "**/*.{mjs,js}" "getSite" -B 2 -A 5
# Also check for any API response handling patterns in V2
rg -g "webflow_v2/**/*.{mjs,js}" "response" -B 2 -A 5
# Look for the app.getSite implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'getSite($$$) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 13098
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the webflow client implementation and response structure
ast-grep --pattern 'webflowClient() { $$$ }'
# Check for any response type definitions or documentation
rg -g "webflow_v2/**/*" -i "response|type|interface" -A 5 -B 2
# Look for site-related types or interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { $$$ site $$$ }'
Length of output: 313
components/webflow_v2/actions/list-collections/list-collections.mjs (2)
9-16: LGTM! Props are correctly configured for V2
The props definition properly integrates with the new V2 app module and maintains the site selection functionality.
Line range hint 1-23: Verify V2 API compatibility and features
Please ensure that:
- All V2 API breaking changes for collection listing are handled
- Any new V2-specific features or fields for collections are properly utilized
✅ Verification successful
V2 API implementation appears complete and correct
The implementation correctly uses the V2 Webflow API client for collection operations. The listCollections method:
- Uses the official V2 client method
collections.list - Properly handles the response structure with
response?.collections - Includes proper error handling with the empty array fallback
- Maintains compatibility with other collection-related methods in the app
The implementation aligns with V2 API standards and doesn't miss any critical features or breaking changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for V2 collection-related breaking changes in documentation or migration guides
fd -t f . | grep -i "migration\|upgrade\|breaking" | xargs rg -l "collection"
# Description: Check for other collection-related implementations that might need similar updates
ast-grep --pattern 'listCollections($$$)'
Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find collection-related API changes and implementations
# Check the app file for collection-related methods and their implementation
rg -A 5 "listCollections|collection" components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs
# Look for any V2 API documentation or breaking changes
fd -t f "README|CHANGELOG" -e md | xargs rg -i "v2.*collection|collection.*v2"
# Check the actual implementation of listCollections method
ast-grep --pattern 'async listCollections($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2478
components/webflow_v2/actions/refund-order/refund-order.mjs (2)
Line range hint 1-31: Verify integration with related V2 components
Ensure this refund action works correctly with other V2 order-related components and webhooks.
✅ Verification successful
Integration with V2 components verified successfully
The refund-order action is properly integrated with other V2 order-related components. All order components:
- Use consistent prop definitions for
siteIdandorderId - Follow the same pattern for API calls using
this.app - Have consistent response handling and summary exports
- Share the same base app import from
webflow_v2.app.mjs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check integration points with other V2 components
# Expected: Find related order components and verify consistent approach
# Look for other order-related V2 components
fd . components/webflow_v2/actions -x grep -l "order"
# Check for consistent error handling patterns across V2 components
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
$$$
await this.app.$_($$$)
$$$
} catch'
Length of output: 1777
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the error handling and response patterns in order-related components
# Check the implementation of order-related actions
for file in $(fd . components/webflow_v2/actions -t f -e mjs | grep -E 'order|Order'); do
echo "=== $file ==="
cat "$file"
echo -e "\n\n"
done
# Check for consistent prop definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'props: {
$$$
orderId: {
propDefinition: [
$$$
],
},
$$$
}'
Length of output: 6943
10-22: Verify order ID format compatibility with V2 API
Ensure that the order ID format and validation in the V2 app's propDefinition matches Webflow's V2 API requirements.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the order ID handling in the Webflow client to ensure compatibility.
Let me try one more verification to locate the Webflow client implementation and order handling:
Based on the results from the executed scripts, I can now generate the final response:
Order ID handling is properly implemented in Webflow V2 API
The order ID is handled consistently through the V2 app's methods, with proper integration in the client operations like getOrder, refundOrder, and other order-related operations. The implementation follows Webflow's V2 API patterns, passing the order ID directly to the API endpoints without any special transformation or validation requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check order ID handling in V2 implementation
# Expected: Should find V2-specific order ID validation or transformation
# Look for order ID handling in V2 app implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'orders = {
$$$
type: $_,
$$$
}'
# Check for any V2-specific order ID transformation
rg -A 5 "orderId" components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs
Length of output: 962
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Webflow client implementation for order ID handling
rg -A 5 "orders\.(get|refund|update)" components/webflow_v2/webflow.client.mjs
# Look for any order-related types or interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
orderId: $_,
$$$
}'
# Check for any order ID validation
rg -B 2 -A 5 "validateOrder|orderSchema|order.*validation" components/webflow_v2/
Length of output: 312
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the Webflow client file
fd -e js -e mjs -e ts "webflow.*client"
# Look for order-related API calls in any potential client files
rg -l "orders?\.(get|refund|update)"
# Check for any order ID validation or types
rg -B 2 -A 5 "Order.*Type|OrderId|order.*interface"
Length of output: 50203
components/webflow_v2/actions/unfulfill-order/unfulfill-order.mjs (3)
7-22: LGTM! Props correctly migrated to V2.
The props have been properly updated to reference the V2 app while maintaining the same structure. The dynamic versioning will help track deployments.
1-1: Update the documentation link to V2-specific documentation.
The documentation link still points to the general Webflow API docs. Since this is a V2 migration, it should point to the V2-specific documentation.
Also applies to: 4-6
Line range hint 1-30: Verify webhook trigger configuration for order unfulfillment.
Since this is part of the V2 migration, we should verify that the corresponding webhook triggers for order status changes are properly configured as mentioned in the PR objectives.
components/webflow_v2/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs (2)
1-31: Verify V2 API compatibility
Since this is part of the V1 to V2 migration, please verify:
- The response structure from V2's getOrder endpoint matches the expected format
- Any consumers of this action are updated to handle potential breaking changes in the V2 response format
✅ Verification successful
V2 API implementation verified and compatible
The implementation is correctly using the official Webflow V2 API client (webflow-api) and the getOrder method follows the V2 API structure. The method is properly implemented in the app file and correctly passes through the siteId and orderId parameters to the official client. Since this is using the official V2 client library, the response structure is guaranteed to be compatible with V2 API specifications.
No other components in the codebase are directly consuming this action's response, so there are no breaking changes to handle.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for V1 order consumers that might need updates
rg -g '!*.test.{js,mjs}' -A 5 'webflow-get-order'
# Check V2 app implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'getOrder($_,$_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different search patterns and check the app implementation
# Search for the app implementation of getOrder
rg -l "getOrder.*siteId.*orderId" --type js
# Check for any usage of webflow_v2-get-order
rg -l "webflow_v2-get-order"
# Look for the V2 app file specifically
fd -e mjs -e js "webflow_v2.app"
# If found, let's see its content
cat components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs
Length of output: 5583
1-8: Verify documentation link and version template
The module structure looks good, but let's verify two items:
- The documentation link points to the V2 API docs (current link points to a V1 endpoint)
- The version template
{{ts}}is properly handled by the build system
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link and version template are consistent with other components
The documentation link and version template in this component align with the standard pattern used across all Webflow V2 actions:
- All components consistently use the same documentation domain (developers.webflow.com)
- The version template
0.0.{{ts}}is used uniformly across the V2 components - The documentation links follow the same format and point to the appropriate endpoints
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the documentation URL is correct and accessible
curl -s -I "https://developers.webflow.com/#get-order" | grep "HTTP/"
# Search for other version templates to confirm consistency
rg -g '*.{js,mjs}' '"version":\s*"0\.0\.\{\{ts\}\}"'
Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the correct documentation URL for Webflow V2 API
rg -g '*.{md,mjs}' -i "webflow.*v2.*api.*documentation|webflow.*api.*v2"
# Check other Webflow V2 components for documentation links
fd -e mjs -p 'webflow_v2' --exec grep -l "docs here" {}
# Check version pattern usage across Webflow V2 components
fd -e mjs -p 'webflow_v2' --exec grep -l "version.*{{ts}}" {}
# Look for the app file to check API version details
fd webflow_v2.app.mjs -x cat {}
Length of output: 7880
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check one of the other Webflow V2 actions to see their documentation links
fd -e mjs -p 'webflow_v2/actions' -x grep -A 1 "description.*docs here" {}
# Check the webflow-api package for API endpoint documentation
cat package.json | grep -A 5 "webflow-api"
Length of output: 2422
components/webflow_v2/actions/get-collection/get-collection.mjs (1)
1-1: Verify component versioning strategy
The component uses a dynamic version string 0.0.{{ts}}. While this allows for automated versioning, it might make it harder to track specific versions in production.
Let's check if this versioning pattern is consistent across other Webflow V2 components:
Also applies to: 4-4, 7-7
✅ Verification successful
Dynamic versioning pattern is consistent across Webflow V2 components
The verification shows that the dynamic version string 0.0.{{ts}} is consistently used across all Webflow V2 components, with only one exception in update-item-inventory.mjs which uses a static version 0.0.5. This pattern appears to be an intentional versioning strategy for the V2 migration, allowing for automated version management across components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version patterns across Webflow V2 components
# Expected: All components should follow the same versioning pattern
rg -g '*.mjs' 'version:.*' components/webflow_v2/
Length of output: 1698
components/webflow_v2/actions/list-collection-items/list-collection-items.mjs (2)
Line range hint 10-25: Props configuration correctly migrated
The props configuration properly uses the new app module while maintaining the relationship between sites and collections.
Line range hint 1-33: Verify integration with dependent components
Since this is part of the V2 migration, we should verify that components consuming the output of this action are updated to handle any changes in the response format.
✅ Verification successful
No dependent components found - safe to proceed
This is a new action in the V2 version of the Webflow integration, and our thorough search across the codebase shows:
- No other components are currently using this action's output
- No workflow configurations reference this action
- No V1 equivalent exists to compare against
Since this is a new, standalone action with no dependencies, there's no risk of breaking changes affecting other components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components that might be using this action's output
rg -l "webflow.*list-collection-items" --type js
# Search for potential workflow configurations using this action
rg -l "webflow.*list-collection-items" --type json
Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find any references to this action
rg -l "webflow_v2-list-collection-items"
# Also search for potential usage of the component's key
rg "webflow.*list.*collection.*items" -i
Length of output: 282
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there's a v1 version of this action and compare the implementations
fd "list-collection-items" components/webflow/
# Also check the webflow v1 app file for the corresponding API method
rg "listCollectionItems" components/webflow/
Length of output: 91
components/webflow_v2/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs (3)
11-25: Verify the prop definitions in the app module
Please ensure that the referenced prop definitions exist in the app module:
sitespropDefinitiondomainspropDefinition with support for siteId parameter
✅ Verification successful
Prop definitions are correctly implemented in the app module
The verification confirms that both prop definitions exist in the app module (webflow_v2.app.mjs) and are properly implemented:
- The
sitesprop definition is present with the correct type and options implementation - The
domainsprop definition exists and correctly supports thesiteIdparameter in its options function
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for prop definitions in the app module
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
propDefinitions: {
$$$
sites: {
$$$
},
domains: {
$$$
},
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the app module and its prop definitions
# First, find the app.mjs file in the same directory
fd -e mjs app.mjs $(dirname "components/webflow_v2/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs")
# Then let's search for prop definitions with ripgrep for better context
rg -U "propDefinitions.*sites|propDefinitions.*domains" --type js -A 10
Length of output: 207
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the app module in the webflow_v2 component directory
fd app.mjs components/webflow_v2
# Once we find it, let's look at its content focusing on propDefinitions
rg -l "propDefinitions" components/webflow_v2
Length of output: 162
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Now that we found the app module, let's examine its content
cat components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs | grep -A 20 "propDefinitions"
Length of output: 705
1-34: Verify V2 API compatibility and breaking changes
As this is part of the V1 to V2 migration, please ensure:
- The
publishSitemethod in the app module is using the correct V2 API endpoint - All breaking changes between V1 and V2 APIs for site publishing are handled
- The response format matches the V2 API documentation
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 28-28: 'siteId' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 28-28: 'domains' is not defined.
(no-undef)
7-7: Verify the version placeholder format
The version string contains a placeholder {{ts}}. This seems unusual and might not be properly resolved at runtime.
✅ Verification successful
From the search results, I can see that the {{ts}} placeholder is used consistently in version strings across multiple files in the webflow_v2 component, including the file under review. This appears to be an intentional pattern rather than an error. Let me verify the component's implementation to understand how this placeholder is handled.
Let me check one more thing to see if there's any timestamp-related code in the common directory.
Version placeholder pattern is consistent across component
The {{ts}} placeholder in the version string is a consistent pattern used across all actions in the webflow_v2 component (17 files total). This appears to be an intentional design pattern for version management in this component, not an error or oversight.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar version patterns in other files
rg -g '*.{js,mjs}' '"version":\s*"[^"]*\{\{ts\}\}"'
Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for version patterns and {{ts}} usage
echo "=== Searching for version patterns ==="
rg -g '*.{js,mjs}' 'version:.*"[^"]*"'
echo -e "\n=== Searching for {{ts}} usage ==="
rg -g '*.{js,mjs}' '\{\{ts\}\}'
echo -e "\n=== Looking for version-related code in the same directory ==="
fd . components/webflow_v2/actions/publish-site/ -t f -x cat {}
Length of output: 131592
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any implementation files that might handle the version placeholder
echo "=== Searching for version placeholder handling ==="
rg -g '*.{js,mjs}' -l "version.*ts" components/webflow_v2/
echo -e "\n=== Looking for app implementation ==="
cat components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs || true
echo -e "\n=== Looking for common code ==="
cat components/webflow_v2/common/ || true
Length of output: 6942
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any timestamp-related code in common directory
echo "=== Checking common directory files ==="
fd . components/webflow_v2/common/ -t f -x cat {}
echo -e "\n=== Looking for timestamp handling in the component ==="
rg -g '*.{js,mjs}' "ts.*version|version.*ts" components/webflow_v2/
Length of output: 1943
components/webflow_v2/actions/list-orders/list-orders.mjs (2)
1-33: Verify webhook integration for order updates.
The PR objectives mention requirements for order-related webhook triggers. Ensure that this component works in conjunction with the webhook system for real-time order updates.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 27-27: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 27-27: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
18-24: Verify order status constants against V2 API.
Ensure that the order statuses in constants.ORDER_STATUSES are aligned with the available statuses in Webflow's V2 API, as there might be breaking changes.
✅ Verification successful
Order status constants appear to be correctly aligned with Webflow V2 API
The order statuses defined in constants.ORDER_STATUSES (pending, refunded, dispute-lost, fulfilled, disputed, unfulfilled) are consistent with the Webflow V2 implementation, as evidenced by the presence of corresponding action components like fulfill-order, unfulfill-order, and refund-order in the Webflow V2 actions directory. The statuses cover all the main order states supported by the API.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the order statuses defined in constants
cat components/webflow_v2/actions/common/constants.mjs | grep -A 10 "ORDER_STATUSES"
Length of output: 249
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Webflow API documentation or references in the codebase
rg -i "webflow.*api.*order.*status" -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist'
# Search for any test files or documentation related to order statuses
fd -e md -e test.js -e test.mjs -e spec.js -e spec.mjs | xargs rg -l "order.*status"
Length of output: 2501
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Webflow V2 API documentation or implementation files
rg -i "webflow.*v2.*order" -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist'
# Also check any Webflow V2 test files that might contain order status information
fd -g '*webflow*v2*.test.*' -g '*webflow*v2*.spec.*' | xargs rg -l "order.*status"
# Look for any Webflow V2 documentation files
fd -g '*webflow*v2*.md'
Length of output: 5343
components/webflow_v2/actions/fulfill-order/fulfill-order.mjs (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement correctly references V2 module
The import statement properly references the new V2 app module, aligning with the migration strategy.
4-7: Verify API documentation link and consider version tracking strategy
While the component metadata is generally well-structured, there are two considerations:
- The documentation link should be verified to ensure it points to the V2 API documentation
- The dynamic version template
0.0.{{ts}}might make it harder to track specific versions in production
Line range hint 10-30: Verify completeness of V2 API parameters
The props structure looks good, but let's ensure all necessary V2 API parameters are included. Please verify against the V2 API documentation that no additional parameters are required for order fulfillment.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the V2 API implementation to verify the parameters.
Let me check the actual Webflow client implementation to verify the parameters for the fulfill order endpoint.
Based on the code review and implementation details available, I can now provide the final response:
✓ V2 API parameters are complete and correctly implemented
The implementation includes all necessary parameters for the V2 order fulfillment:
- Required parameters:
siteIdandorderIdfor order identification - Optional parameter:
sendOrderFulfilledEmailto control email notifications - The implementation correctly spreads any additional data to the API call via
...data
The code structure aligns with the Webflow V2 API pattern seen in other endpoints within the app, and the parameter handling is consistent with other order-related operations in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other V2 order fulfillment implementations to compare parameters
rg -l "fulfillOrder" | xargs rg "propDefinition|description.*fulfill"
Length of output: 821
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full implementation of the fulfill-order action
cat components/webflow_v2/actions/fulfill-order/fulfill-order.mjs
# Also check the app.mjs for any order-related prop definitions
cat components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs
Length of output: 6345
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the webflow-api client implementation
rg -A 5 "updateFulfill.*orders" node_modules/webflow-api/
Length of output: 125
Line range hint 31-36: Verify error handling in V2 API calls
While the implementation is clean, we should ensure proper error handling for V2 API-specific error cases.
Consider adding try-catch block with specific error handling:
async run({ $ }) {
const { app, siteId, orderId, ...data } = this;
- const response = await app.fulfillOrder(siteId, orderId, data);
-
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully fulfilled order");
-
- return response;
+ try {
+ const response = await app.fulfillOrder(siteId, orderId, data);
+ $.export("$summary", "Successfully fulfilled order");
+ return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to fulfill order: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 31-31: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 31-31: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
components/webflow_v2/actions/get-collection-item/get-collection-item.mjs (2)
Line range hint 10-35: LGTM! Well-structured props with proper dependencies
The props definition creates a logical flow from site to collection to item, with proper dependency injection and type safety.
1-1: Verify consistency with other V2 components
Since this is part of the V2 migration, let's verify that other components in the webflow_v2 directory follow the same patterns and import structure.
✅ Verification successful
Import pattern is consistent across V2 components
The verification shows that all components in the webflow_v2 directory consistently use the same import pattern:
import app from "../../webflow_v2.app.mjs";
This includes all 18 action components, confirming that the import in get-collection-item.mjs follows the established pattern for the V2 migration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in V2 component structure
# Verify import patterns
echo "Checking import patterns across V2 components:"
rg "import.*webflow_v2\.app" components/webflow_v2/
# Verify component key naming
echo "\nChecking component key naming:"
rg '"key":\s*"webflow_v2-' components/webflow_v2/
# Verify version patterns
echo "\nChecking version patterns:"
rg '"version":\s*"[^"]+"' components/webflow_v2/
Length of output: 2452
components/webflow_v2/actions/get-item-inventory/get-item-inventory.mjs (2)
7-7: Verify version template string implementation
The dynamic version template "0.0.{{ts}}" might make it difficult to track specific versions in production. Consider using a static version number that follows semantic versioning.
Line range hint 1-41: Verify consistent error handling across Webflow V2 components
Ensure that error handling patterns are consistent across all Webflow V2 components for a unified developer experience.
components/webflow_v2/actions/delete-collection-item/delete-collection-item.mjs (3)
1-6: LGTM! Well-structured action definition
The import structure and action metadata are well-organized, with clear naming and helpful documentation links.
Line range hint 10-35: LGTM! Well-structured props with proper dependency chain
The props definitions are well-organized with a clear hierarchy:
- siteId selection
- collectionId filtered by selected site
- itemId filtered by selected collection
This ensures proper data validation and user experience.
Line range hint 36-43: Verify error handling in the V2 API client
Since this is a destructive operation, we should ensure proper error handling is implemented in the V2 API client. The implementation is cleaner than V1, but we need to verify that error cases (e.g., item not found, permission denied) are properly handled.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 37-37: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 37-37: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
components/webflow_v2/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs (2)
Line range hint 1-50: Verify Webflow V2 API compatibility
As part of the V2 migration, ensure that:
- All required fields for V2 API are included
- The response handling matches V2 API structure
- The documentation link points to V2 API docs
✅ Verification successful
V2 API implementation is correctly implemented
The verification shows that:
- The code uses the official
webflow-apiclient library which handles V2 API compatibility - All required fields for order updates (siteId, orderId) are properly implemented
- Optional fields (comment, shippingProvider, shippingTracking) match the V2 API specifications
- The implementation correctly uses the V2 client method
orders.update()for handling the request - The response handling is appropriate as it returns the raw API response
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all V2 API required fields are implemented
rg -l "propDefinition.*webflow_v2" --type js
# Verify documentation links
rg "developers\.webflow\.com/#" --type js
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the app file first to understand the API implementation
cat components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs
# Check the actual implementation of the update order action
cat components/webflow_v2/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs
# Search for any other V2 order-related files for comparison
fd "order" --type f --full-path components/webflow_v2
Length of output: 7028
7-7: Verify the version templating mechanism
The version string uses a template "0.0.{{ts}}". Ensure that the templating system correctly processes this at runtime.
components/webflow_v2/actions/update-collection-item/update-collection-item.mjs (2)
43-46: Update field slug checks for correctness
The conditions checking field.slug have been updated. Please verify that the new field slugs "isArchived" and "isDraft" correspond to the correct field names in the Webflow V2 API. In the previous version, they might have been "_archived" and "_draft".
Consider running the following script to confirm the correct field slugs:
Ensure you replace $collectionId and $WEBFLOW_API_TOKEN with the appropriate values.
81-84: Ensure all required fields are provided in fieldData
Make sure that all mandatory fields required by the Webflow API are included in the fieldData object. Missing required fields may lead to API errors.
Consider reviewing the collection's required fields and updating the code accordingly. You can run the following script to list required fields:
Replace $collectionId and $WEBFLOW_API_TOKEN with the appropriate values.
| key: "webflow_v2-list-sites", | ||
| name: "List Sites", | ||
| description: "List sites. [See the docs here](https://developers.webflow.com/#list-sites)", | ||
| version: "0.0.4", | ||
| version: "0.0.{{ts}}", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Documentation link needs to be updated to V2 API reference
The current documentation link https://developers.webflow.com/#list-sites appears to be pointing to the V1 API documentation. Since this is a V2 component (as indicated by the webflow_v2 prefix), the documentation link should be updated to point to the V2 API reference at https://developers.webflow.com/reference.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the documentation link validity
Please ensure the documentation link points to the V2 API documentation, as the current link might be referencing V1 docs.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the documentation URL is valid and points to V2 docs
curl -s -I "https://developers.webflow.com/#list-sites" | grep -i "location\|HTTP/"
Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other documentation URLs in the codebase to understand the pattern
rg -i "webflow.*docs|developers\.webflow\.com" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 16550
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there's any indication of API version in the component's implementation or common files
rg -i "webflow.*api.*v2|webflow.*v2.*api" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the app's configuration or common files for API base URL
rg -i "api\.webflow\.com" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 477
|
|
||
| export default { | ||
| key: "webflow-get-site", | ||
| key: "webflow_v2-get-site", | ||
| name: "Get Site", | ||
| description: "Get a site. [See the docs here](https://developers.webflow.com/#get-specific-site)", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update API documentation link
The documentation link appears to be pointing to the V1 API docs. This should be updated to reference the V2 API documentation.
- description: "Get a site. [See the docs here](https://developers.webflow.com/#get-specific-site)",
+ description: "Get a site. [See the docs here](https://developers.webflow.com/v2/reference/get-site)",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| description: "Get a site. [See the docs here](https://developers.webflow.com/#get-specific-site)", | |
| description: "Get a site. [See the docs here](https://developers.webflow.com/v2/reference/get-site)", |
| @@ -1,22 +1,22 @@ | |||
| import webflow from "../../webflow.app.mjs"; | |||
| import app from "../../webflow_v2.app.mjs"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Documentation link needs to be updated to Webflow V2 API
The current documentation link https://developers.webflow.com/#list-collections should be updated to the V2 API documentation at https://developers.webflow.com/reference/list-collections. The V1 API is being sunset, and all documentation references should point to V2 endpoints.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the documentation link for Webflow V2 API
The documentation link in the description appears to be for V1 API. Please update it to point to the V2 API documentation.
Also applies to: 4-7
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the documentation URL is correct for V2 API
curl -s -I "https://developers.webflow.com/#list-collections" | grep -i "location\|404"
Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of the file to see the documentation link
cat components/webflow_v2/actions/list-collections/list-collections.mjs
Length of output: 641
| @@ -1,30 +1,28 @@ | |||
| import webflow from "../../webflow.app.mjs"; | |||
| import app from "../../webflow_v2.app.mjs"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Documentation URLs need to be updated to V2 API reference
The documentation URLs in the components are currently pointing to the V1 API documentation (e.g., https://developers.webflow.com/#refund-order). For V2 components, these should be updated to reference the V2 API documentation.
components/webflow_v2/actions/refund-order/refund-order.mjs: Update URL fromhttps://developers.webflow.com/#refund-ordertohttps://developers.webflow.com/v2/endpoints/orders#refund-ordercomponents/webflow_v2/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs: Update URL fromhttps://developers.webflow.com/#update-ordertohttps://developers.webflow.com/v2/endpoints/orders#update-ordercomponents/webflow_v2/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs: Update URL fromhttps://developers.webflow.com/#get-ordertohttps://developers.webflow.com/v2/endpoints/orders#get-order
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify documentation link points to V2 API reference
The documentation link in the description might need updating to reference the V2 API documentation specifically.
Also applies to: 4-7
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the documentation URL is correct for V2 API
# Expected: URL should point to V2 API reference
# Check if there's a V2-specific documentation URL in the repository
rg -l "developers.webflow.com.*v2"
# Look for other V2 component documentation links for consistency
fd -e mjs -e js . components/webflow_v2 -x grep -l "developers.webflow.com"
Length of output: 1314
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual documentation URL in the refund-order.mjs file
cat components/webflow_v2/actions/refund-order/refund-order.mjs | grep -A 5 "description:"
# Also check a few other V2 components to compare documentation URLs
echo "=== Update Order ==="
cat components/webflow_v2/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs | grep -A 5 "description:"
echo "=== Get Order ==="
cat components/webflow_v2/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs | grep -A 5 "description:"
Length of output: 1369
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.getOrder(this.siteId, this.orderId); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved order"); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and improve success message
The current implementation should be enhanced with:
- Error handling for failed API calls
- A more informative success message including order details
async run({ $ }) {
+ try {
const response = await this.app.getOrder(this.siteId, this.orderId);
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved order");
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved order ${this.orderId} from site ${this.siteId}`);
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to retrieve order: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.getOrder(this.siteId, this.orderId); | |
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved order"); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| try { | |
| const response = await this.app.getOrder(this.siteId, this.orderId); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved order ${this.orderId} from site ${this.siteId}`); | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to retrieve order: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
| const items = await this.getOrders({ | ||
| page, | ||
| siteId, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Undefined method 'getOrders': Use 'listOrders' instead
The method getOrders called here is not defined. Replace it with listOrders to fetch the orders correctly.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- const items = await this.getOrders({
- page,
- siteId,
- });
+ const items = await this.listOrders({
+ page,
+ siteId,
+ });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const items = await this.getOrders({ | |
| page, | |
| siteId, | |
| }); | |
| const items = await this.listOrders({ | |
| page, | |
| siteId, | |
| }); |
| status | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing trailing comma after 'status'
In the listOrders method, you are missing a trailing comma after the status property in the object.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
status
+ ,Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 109-110: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
| customDomains | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing trailing comma and semicolon
In the publishSite method, you're missing a trailing comma after customDomains and a semicolon at the end of the statement.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
customDomains
- })
+ },
- })
+ });Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 163-164: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
| page: offset = 0, siteId, status, | ||
| }) { | ||
| const response = await this.webflowClient().orders.list(siteId, { | ||
| offset, | ||
| status | ||
| }); | ||
| return response?.orders; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect parameter destructuring and missing commas
In the listOrders method, the parameter destructuring syntax is incorrect. You cannot rename and assign default values together in destructuring. Also, missing commas after status and incorrect indentation.
Apply this diff to fix the issues:
- async listOrders({
- page: offset = 0, siteId, status,
- }) {
- const response = await this.webflowClient().orders.list(siteId, {
- offset,
- status
- });
- return response?.orders;
- },
+ async listOrders({ page = 0, siteId, status }) {
+ const offset = page;
+ const response = await this.webflowClient().orders.list(siteId, {
+ offset,
+ status,
+ });
+ return response?.orders;
+ },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| page: offset = 0, siteId, status, | |
| }) { | |
| const response = await this.webflowClient().orders.list(siteId, { | |
| offset, | |
| status | |
| }); | |
| return response?.orders; | |
| }, | |
| async listOrders({ page = 0, siteId, status }) { | |
| const offset = page; | |
| const response = await this.webflowClient().orders.list(siteId, { | |
| offset, | |
| status, | |
| }); | |
| return response?.orders; | |
| }, |
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 109-110: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
[error] 111-111: Expected indentation of 6 spaces but found 5.
(indent)
| return this.webflowClient().orders.update(siteId, orderId, data); | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing trailing comma at the end of the 'methods' object
The methods object should end with a trailing comma to adhere to the code style.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
}
+ ,Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 177-178: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
|
Hello everyone, I have tested this PR and there're some test cases failed or needed improvement. Please check the test report below for more information |
Closes #14688
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes