Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restore message context in Timeout middleware #517
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Restore message context in Timeout middleware #517
Changes from 1 commit
de06ae3
9f12134
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@zanvd how about we use
context.WithoutCancel(ctx)
here? This way the cancellation won't be propagated while the values stored in the context can be. Would that also solve the root issue? 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
context.WithoutCancel was a great addition to context lately, but here if we use it, it means the context stored again won't be canceled if orgCtx is canceled. It doesn't a good move
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, you're right.
My point is that restoring the context will also remove all context values. If someone uses middleware that uses the context after the handler is executed, it will be lost this way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here is the way then
But I find it ugly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd have to test it out, but this is more or less why I was asking on Discord about usage of context within
Message
- makes it sort of a global object that anyone can modify. Since the blueprint for this was the net/http package, I'd follow its logic and not even allow changing of theMessage
's context. Not something to solve in this PR, though.What would be an example of values stored in the context that we should be vary of? Perhaps copying them to the original context might be a temporary solution.