do nil check for responseCopy.Body

[jeffy-mathew]

User description

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How This Has Been Tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality)

Checklist

• I ensured that the documentation is up to date
• I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required
• I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why

---

PR Type

Bug fix

---

Description

• Added a nil check for responseCopy.Body in gateway/handler_success.go to prevent potential nil pointer dereference errors.
• This change ensures that operations on the response body are only performed if the body is not nil, enhancing the stability of the code.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Bug fix	handler_success.go Add nil check for responseCopy.Body to prevent errors        gateway/handler_success.go Added a nil check for responseCopy.Body to prevent potential nil pointer dereference. Ensures that the body of the response is not nil before proceeding with operations. +1/-1

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[buger]

A JIRA Issue ID is missing from your branch name, PR title and PR description! 🦄

Your branch: fix/sse-streaming

Your PR title: do nil check for responseCopy.Body

Your PR description:

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How This Has Been Tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality)

Checklist

• I ensured that the documentation is up to date
• I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required
• I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why

If this is your first time contributing to this repository - welcome!

---

Please refer to jira-lint to get started.

Without the JIRA Issue ID in your branch name you would lose out on automatic updates to JIRA via SCM; some GitHub status checks might fail.

Valid sample branch names:

‣ feature/shiny-new-feature--mojo-10'
‣ 'chore/changelogUpdate_mojo-123'
‣ 'bugfix/fix-some-strange-bug_GAL-2345'

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Possible Bug Ensure that the nil check for responseCopy.Body is sufficient to prevent any potential nil pointer dereference errors in all scenarios where responseCopy might be manipulated.

[github-actions]

API Changes

no api changes detected

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud