v6.4.1-rc1 (api=1.2.0, abi=1.0.0) #80
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
6.4.1-rc1 (api=1.2.0, abi=1.0.0)
libcdoesn't expose any allocation primitives forwasmtargets.If
wasmis indeed a target which you care a lot about, and you use stabby's allocation primitives a lot, you should probably roll out a better one (maybe even contribute it back).stabby's cross-version contract: it may be swapped out for a better one in a patch-level API-bump.If you need me not to do so (i.e. you pass stabby's allocation primitives in
wasmbetween multiple packages and can't pin your version ofstabbydown to patch for X reason), please reach out to me.