Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: Estimate parameters on surface also if bottom SP is not on surface #3800

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andiwand
Copy link
Contributor

@andiwand andiwand commented Oct 31, 2024

The interface of

template <typename spacepoint_iterator_t>
std::optional<BoundVector> estimateTrackParamsFromSeed(
    const GeometryContext& gctx, spacepoint_iterator_t spBegin,
    spacepoint_iterator_t spEnd, const Surface& surface, const Vector3& bField,
    ActsScalar bFieldMin, const Acts::Logger& logger = getDummyLogger()) {

suggests that the parameters will be estimated on any surface. The doc is making this clear but we also had multiple cases when this would be useful.

Generally a spacepoint does not need to be on surface. For example for combined strip space points this is not the case.

For this reason I propose to replace this function with

template <std::ranges::range spacepoint_range_t>
Result<BoundVector> estimateTrackParamsFromSeedAtSurface(
    const GeometryContext& gctx, const MagneticFieldContext& mctx,
    const Surface& surface, spacepoint_range_t spRange,
    const std::shared_ptr<const MagneticFieldProvider>& bField,
    const std::shared_ptr<const BasePropagator>& propagator = nullptr,
    const Acts::Logger& logger = getDummyLogger()) {

which makes extrapolates the parameters to the surface and the extrapolation is explicit given the propagator parameter. The propagator will be default constructed if none is provided (default).

@andiwand andiwand added this to the next milestone Oct 31, 2024
@andiwand
Copy link
Contributor Author

andiwand commented Oct 31, 2024

@github-actions github-actions bot added Component - Core Affects the Core module Seeding labels Oct 31, 2024
@benjaminhuth
Copy link
Member

would be very useful! 👍

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 31, 2024

📊: Physics performance monitoring for 939a6f3

Full contents

physmon summary

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • coderabbit

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@andiwand
Copy link
Contributor Author

@paulgessinger I implemented what we discussed. cc @benjaminhuth

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 23, 2024

@andiwand andiwand changed the title feat: Estimate parameters on surface also if bottom SP is not on surface feat!: Estimate parameters on surface also if bottom SP is not on surface Nov 25, 2024
@andiwand andiwand marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2024 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component - Core Affects the Core module Component - Examples Affects the Examples module Seeding Track Finding
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants