-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ESXi server at Equinix #2792
Comments
|
New solaris test machine https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/computer/test-equinix_esxi-solaris10-x64-1-NEW/ |
@sxa The original issue #2666 (comment), there are 3 ubuntu16 machines which needed to be virtualised, im guessing theyre to be used for perf testing. Ive virtualised one https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/computer/test-equinix_esxi-ubuntu1604-x64-1-NEW/, do we still need 2 more? |
We should have two. I would also suggest that since we're switching to new hardware (where the perf characteristics will be different anyway) that we bump them up to ubuntu 22.04 instead of 16.04 which is now unsupported. I'd suggest one more - and possibly on the same machine purely because if we split it across AMD vs Intel with differnet characteristics the results won't be consistent. For all the others we should split them with one on each of two ESXi servers. |
I've upgraded the ubuntu16 perf machine I made earlier to 2204, https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/computer/test-equinix_esxi-ubuntu2204-x64-1-NEW/, and created a second u2204 perf machine https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/computer/test-equinix_esxi-ubuntu2204-x64-1 |
A second ESXi server has been created as the first one ran out of assignable IP addresses. On this second server, we have the 2 tck machines, solaris and ubuntu. EF are currently setting them up with an ETA of before the end of the month |
@Haroon-Khel Can we close this now? I don't think there are any other immediate action items for it other than adding to the inventory. |
I need to request a new machine:
Please explain what this machine is needed for:
To be consistent with the existing naming convention these should have a provider name of
equinix_esxi
in the hostname:Guest VMs required are as follows. Specs listed are of the existing systems
I'll create tick boxes for the second instance too:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: