Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GUACAMOLE-1499: Mention some caveats with VNC #181

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dstndstn
Copy link
Contributor

  • mention that file transfer is not supported by VNC, so sftp is required.
  • this may be too detailed -- mention that the Ubuntu 18.04 shipped package does not support copy/paste; point to an alternative.

Comment on lines +757 to +762
On Ubuntu Linux version 18.04, the package
`tigervnc-standalone-server` does not support clipboard (copy/paste)
functionality. The `tigervncserver` packages provided by the TigerVNC
project (https://sourceforge.net/projects/tigervnc/files/stable/) do
support clipboard operations.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My thought, here, is that, instead of trying to cover what the capabilities of specific distributions, versions, and VNC servers support, it might be better go more generic. Something more like Your distribution and VNC server may not support clipboard functionality - please check the documentation or locate a VNC server/version that does.

I'm just not sure the Guacamole Manual is the place to try to document (and keep up-to-date) the capabilities of various distributions and VNC servers. I don't think that'll scale well :-).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I hear you. But there is not other documentation to check, and how is one supposed to "find one that does". I don't know what causes a VNC server to have clipboard functionality that works or doesn't with guacamole, but it's certainly not something they document in a clear way! Would a "known good" / "known missing some functionality" list be more palatable? It would at least be less wordy.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I'd be okay with a couple of lists like that - these VNC servers are known to work, these are not, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants