chore: Error Tab changes for Debugger #37684
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
/build-deploy-preview |
github-actions
bot
added
the
skip-changelog
|
Deploying Your Preview: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12011682403. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/index.tsx (1)
34-39: Consider using a more declarative approach.The logic is correct, but could be more readable using early returns.
- const countContent = - messageCounters.errors !== 0 - ? messageCounters.errors > 99 - ? "(99+)" - : `(${messageCounters.errors})` - : ""; + const countContent = (() => { + if (messageCounters.errors === 0) return ""; + if (messageCounters.errors > 99) return "(99+)"; + return `(${messageCounters.errors})`; + })();app/client/src/sagas/JSPaneSagas.ts (1)
Line range hint
632-633: Address technical debtThere are several TODO comments and disabled eslint rules that should be addressed:
// TODO: Fix this the next time the file is edited// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-anyConsider using proper typing instead of
anyto improve type safety.Would you like me to help create proper TypeScript interfaces for these cases?
app/client/src/sagas/ActionExecution/PluginActionSaga.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1200: Consider splitting complex sagas into smaller, focused functionsThe file contains several long saga functions that handle multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking down functions like
executePluginActionSagaandrunActionSagainto smaller, more focused functions to improve maintainability.For example:
- Extract error handling logic into a separate helper
- Split action execution validation into its own function
- Move analytics logging to a dedicated helper
This would make the code easier to test and maintain.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
app/client/packages/design-system/ads/src/__assets__/icons/ads/debug.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
app/client/packages/design-system/ads/src/Icon/Icon.provider.tsx(2 hunks)app/client/src/ce/constants/messages.ts(1 hunks)app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/DebuggerTabs.tsx(0 hunks)app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/index.tsx(2 hunks)app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/styles.ts(0 hunks)app/client/src/pages/Editor/DataSourceEditor/Debugger.tsx(0 hunks)app/client/src/sagas/ActionExecution/PluginActionSaga.ts(2 hunks)app/client/src/sagas/JSPaneSagas.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/DebuggerTabs.tsx
- app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/styles.ts
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/DataSourceEditor/Debugger.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app/client/src/ce/constants/messages.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
app/client/src/sagas/JSPaneSagas.ts
[error] 540-540: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/index.tsx (2)
6-6: LGTM! Good use of design system components.
Using the standard Button component from @appsmith/ads ensures UI consistency.
43-51: Verify the "debug" icon availability.
The Button implementation looks good, but let's verify the "debug" icon exists in the icon system.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual icon definition to verify its availability.
The "debug" icon is available in the icon system.
The icon is properly defined in the icon provider as:
const DebugIcon = importSvg(
async () => import("../__assets__/icons/ads/debug.svg"),
);And registered in the lookup:
const ICON_LOOKUP = {
// ...
debug: DebugIcon,
// ...
};🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for debug icon definition in the codebase
rg -l "debug.*Icon" --type ts
Length of output: 716
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the icon provider file for debug icon definition
cat app/client/packages/design-system/ads/src/Icon/Icon.provider.tsx
Length of output: 48910
app/client/src/sagas/JSPaneSagas.ts (1)
75-75: Verify error handling after import removals
The removal of error-related imports suggests changes in error handling strategy. Let's verify that all error cases are still properly handled.
app/client/src/sagas/ActionExecution/PluginActionSaga.ts (1)
893-893: Verify error object structure consistency across consumers
The direct passing of the error object to the payload could affect error display in the UI. Let's verify the error object structure is consistent with what consumers expect.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the error handling implementation in the reducer to verify the error object structure.
Let me check how the error object is being used in the reducers and action handlers.
Let me try a different search pattern to find the error handling implementation.
Let me check how the error is consumed in the reducers to verify the error handling consistency.
Direct error object usage is consistent with consumer expectations
The error handling implementation is consistent across the codebase. The error object is properly consumed in both reducers:
- actionsReducer uses it to update loading state
- pluginEditorReducer extracts error message for display
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check error object usage in UI components
# Search for components that consume action errors
rg -A 5 'RUN_ACTION_ERROR'
Length of output: 4978
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the error handling implementation in the reducer
ast-grep --pattern 'error: Error'
Length of output: 110980
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for RUN_ACTION_ERROR usage in reducers and action handlers
rg -A 5 "RUN_ACTION_ERROR.*payload"
Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for RUN_ACTION_ERROR type and payload structure
rg -A 10 "type: ReduxActionErrorTypes.RUN_ACTION_ERROR"
Length of output: 1942
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for RUN_ACTION_ERROR handling in reducers
rg -A 10 "\[ReduxActionErrorTypes.RUN_ACTION_ERROR\]"
Length of output: 2127
app/client/packages/design-system/ads/src/Icon/Icon.provider.tsx (1)
1075-1077: LGTM! The changes follow the established icon management patterns.
The addition of the DebugIcon and its corresponding entry in the ICON_LOOKUP object follows the codebase conventions.
Also applies to: 1120-1120
|
Deploy-Preview-URL: https://ce-37684.dp.appsmith.com |
|
/build-deploy-preview |
|
Deploying Your Preview: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12030716022. |
|
Deploy-Preview-URL: https://ce-37684.dp.appsmith.com |
|
/build-deploy-preview |
|
Deploying Your Preview: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12051044250. |
|
Deploy-Preview-URL: https://ce-37684.dp.appsmith.com |
Description
Fixes Parts of #37676
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
🔍 Cypress test results
Warning
Tests have not run on the HEAD 9d53255 yet
Wed, 27 Nov 2024 13:13:16 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
DebugIconfor enhanced visual representation.INSPECT_TAB.