Runtianz/new script composer

[runtian-zhou]

Description

Reopen the script composer feature with updated dependency built into aptos-labs.

Test Plan

CI

Tested that the package can work in web, nodejs and nextjs environment.

Related Links

#565

Checklist

• Have you ran pnpm fmt?
• Have you updated the CHANGELOG.md?

[0xmaayan]

Please test and validate it

1. Passes all SDK unit + examples tests
2. Does not break a client-side render app (react)
3. Does not break a server-side render app (nextjs)

[WGB5445]

Please test and validate it

1. Passes all SDK unit + examples tests
2. Does not break a client-side render app (react)
3. Does not break a server-side render app (nextjs)

I have tested a React + Vite client-side render app and a Next.js server-side render app.
Both work fine.

However, it's worth noting that in the current version, the initialization is done when the SDK loads, so the bundled JavaScript is a bit large—about 5 MB for the client-side.

[0xmaayan]

Please test and validate it

1. Passes all SDK unit + examples tests
2. Does not break a client-side render app (react)
3. Does not break a server-side render app (nextjs)

I have tested a React + Vite client-side render app and a Next.js server-side render app. Both work fine.

However, it's worth noting that in the current version, the initialization is done when the SDK loads, so the bundled JavaScript is a bit large—about 5 MB for the client-side.

The bundle size is a concern. I'd like to get consensus from the sdk team before approving it. @gregnazario @GhostWalker562

[GhostWalker562]

@0xmaayan I personally think its too much 😞 since it's already 5x the bundle size. People are already complaining about 421kb from poseidon-lite #578 but if it's really needed in the SDK I'm not going to push back that much.

I'm curious if we can test it in a react-native environment as well?

[0xmaayan]

@0xmaayan I personally think its too much 😞 since it's already 5x the bundle size. People are already complaining about 421kb from poseidon-lite #578 but if it's really needed in the SDK I'm not going to push back that much.

I'm curious if we can test it in a react-native environment as well?

@runtian-zhou

1. Any reason we dont move the wasm initialization to the end user?
2. Thoughts on releasing it under a tagged version?

@GhostWalker562 I dont think the SDK officially supports react-native, but I assume you want it tested for Petra?

[runtian-zhou]

Thoughts on releasing it under a tagged version?

I think that would be amazing.

[0xmaayan]

Thoughts on releasing it under a tagged version?

I think that would be amazing.

Cool. Then we dont need to merge it to main, but release a tagged version from this branch

[runtian-zhou]

Let's release it first and get feedbacks from the community. I'm getting multiple asks for this feature so would be great to let them try it out first. In the meantime, we can optimize on the packaging situation.

[lumos42]

eagerly waiting to use this feature in our app