-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Triso no growth deployment setup Scenario: DAN4 #170
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! I just had one or two minor comments on things
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the feedback @LukeSeifert! I've gone through and adjusted to your excellent finds, when this gets merged, I'll pull the updates to the low growth scenario in #172
Ok, thank you for the feedback @LukeSeifert, I have addressed each of your comments! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
This PR setups up the growth deployment calculations using
reactor deployment
for the no growth scenario using the greedy, rough random, and rough + greedy deployment schemes.The no growth scenario is a 0% demand increase year-to-year starting in 2029 when the advanced reactors will begin deployment. Each deployment scheme attempts to meet this demand with pre-defined reactor models. Currently there are only Xe-100s and MMRs, this will be expanded (there is an issue #171 associated with this).
It also includes a README with basic information about the triso project with scenarios, updates the lwr_csv to include Voglte 3 and 4, and adds a style file for plotting uniformly in the folder.