Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updates to disqus_export to make it more robust and informative #14

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

tomscytale
Copy link

I had to upload an crufty dataset to disqus with many comment records that had become corrupt. I made several changes to enable disqus_export deal more gracefully with bad data and output useful information.

details:
add option to specify a log file to which all errors will be output
--dry-run now will do full data processing but stop short of uploading data
add -j options to skip past the first comment stored (to get around broken data)
add -c option to continue on errors
rename a variable to avoid conflict with model name
give more informative output including progress report
give more informative error reporting including details of models which are corrupt
give more informative output on http errors

add -j options to skip past the first comment stored (to get around broken data)
add -c option to continue on errors
rename a variable to avoid conflict with model name
give more informative output including progress report
give more informative error reproting
give more informative output on http errors
add option to specify a log file to which all errors will be output
--dry-run now will do full data processing but stop short of uploading data
@tomscytale
Copy link
Author

hey - have you any interest in this change? If so I can test it against HEAD.

@SalahAdDin
Copy link

@tomscytale ok!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants