Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added execution steps in P.R. template #70

Merged

Conversation

kirinain
Copy link

@kirinain kirinain commented Feb 22, 2024

Description 📖

Have added the "execution steps" part in P.R. template.

Fixes #60

Type of change 📜

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • This change requires a documentation update

@kirinain
Copy link
Author

Its not specified in which branch we have to make changes, as we can't directly do it in main branch but will further have to inculcate it in the contribution section.

@topguns837
Copy link
Contributor

topguns837 commented Feb 22, 2024

Please inculcate these feedbacks:

  • Please open a Github Issue regarding this and link it to this P.R. Itself. This helps us in tracking down project progress and helps in managing workflows.

  • Please add a detailed description of the issue, alongwith a suitable title. I am not able to understand what this P.R. is about right now. You can take inspiration from here : Fixed case sensitivity issue #68

Thank you for your time and effort. Please reach out to me if you need any help !

@kirinain kirinain changed the title execution steps Added exexcution steps in P.R. template Feb 23, 2024
@kirinain
Copy link
Author

@topguns837 I have made the required changes and have opened a new issue #71

@topguns837 topguns837 changed the title Added exexcution steps in P.R. template Added execution steps in P.R. template Mar 27, 2024
@topguns837 topguns837 merged commit 95461b9 into atom-robotics-lab:develop Mar 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants