Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(workflow): add codeql analysis job on go source #438

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

ccamel
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel commented Aug 19, 2023

Self explanatory. This PR introduces a basic Github Action job into the existing lint workflow for CodeQL. This job assesses general security and code quality to enhance and improve the overall quality of the code of the chain.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #438 (37d9167) into main (70fce53) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #438   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.94%   64.94%           
=======================================
  Files          62       62           
  Lines        2707     2707           
=======================================
  Hits         1758     1758           
  Misses        870      870           
  Partials       79       79           

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@ccamel ccamel marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2023 09:49
Copy link
Contributor

@bdeneux bdeneux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let see the result 🤞

@ccamel ccamel merged commit 0ca913d into main Aug 22, 2023
20 checks passed
@ccamel ccamel deleted the ci/codeql branch August 22, 2023 12:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants