Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: added sort for blocks, return last 5 #58

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

yevhen-burkovskyi
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduced in staking.service.ts mainly focus on refactoring and enhancing the functionality of the StakingService class. A new private method sortRecentlyProposedBlocks has been added to handle sorting logic, and the getRecentlyProposedBlocks method has been updated to utilize this sorting and return the top 5 blocks.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/modules/staking/services/staking.service.ts Introduced sortRecentlyProposedBlocks method and updated getRecentlyProposedBlocks to return the top 5 sorted blocks.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant StakingService
    participant Blockchain

    User->>StakingService: getRecentlyProposedBlocks()
    StakingService->>Blockchain: Fetch recent blocks
    Blockchain-->>StakingService: Return blocks data
    StakingService->>StakingService: sortRecentlyProposedBlocks(blocks)
    StakingService-->>User: Return top 5 sorted blocks
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80e20f5 and a458693.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/modules/staking/services/staking.service.ts (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
src/modules/staking/services/staking.service.ts (4)

522-522: Verify correct error handling.

Ensure that the error handling mechanism properly logs and manages deserialization errors.


522-523: LGTM!

The function correctly fetches and sorts recently proposed blocks.


533-537: LGTM!

The function correctly sorts blocks based on their height.


558-565: LGTM!

The function correctly fetches, sorts, and returns the top 5 recently proposed blocks.

@yevhen-burkovskyi yevhen-burkovskyi self-assigned this Jul 9, 2024
@yevhen-burkovskyi yevhen-burkovskyi merged commit 547089b into main Jul 9, 2024
11 checks passed
@yevhen-burkovskyi yevhen-burkovskyi deleted the fix/blocks branch July 9, 2024 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants