-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 441
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add s390x arch support #2616
Add s390x arch support #2616
Conversation
@UebelAndre - now we have buildifier binaries available for s390x arch from buildtools 7.3.1 https://github.com/bazelbuild/buildtools/releases/download/v7.3.1/buildifier-linux-s390x . Can we please update the same on
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like you just need to run buildifier one more time and the change is good to go!
@UebelAndre - I don't have access to retry or rerun buildifier on CI, please provide me the access to the same. |
You would just run buildifier on whatever machine you can and push the results to your branch. |
@UebelAndre - Can we upgrade the buildifier to 7.3.1? where we have s390x binary is available. |
Yeah, go ahead and bump the version 😄 |
@UebelAndre - I have fixed the buildifier CI failures, Can you please merge this PR, we need this for a customer deployment. |
@UebelAndre - All CI checks passed. Can you please help us on merging this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, looks good to me!
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ rust_library( | |||
"@rules_rust//rust/platform:i686-unknown-linux-gnu": [ | |||
"errno", # i686-unknown-linux-gnu | |||
], | |||
"@rules_rust//rust/platform:s390x-unknown-linux-gnu": [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Repana-Chowdappa I noticed on #2841 that this change goes away when I regenerate dependencies. How was this produced?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@UebelAndre - any specific reason to remove this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These files are generated and if there is a change made to them they should be made in a way that regenerates into the file. The removal feels more like a miss where something was not hooked up correctly and I was wondering how these came to be in the first place.
@UebelAndre - when will be the next release for rules_rust? so that we will have rust available for s390x platform. |
This is continuing of #2557 , added buildifier code changes for s390x arch also.