Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rate early leavers #534

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

L-e-x-o-n
Copy link
Collaborator

Rating system should be primarily used to rate players with the goal of achieving better balanced teams resulting in higher quality matches.
The only thing that should matter is the final outcome of the match, it should not be used as a way to punish undesired behaviour such as early resigning. Bad strategies such as early resigning should naturally lead to worse team performance reducing the possibility of victory,

Currently losses always result in rating reduction, however you only get increased rating if you were present for at least 90% of the match (check Teiserver.Battle.MatchLib.calculate_exit_status for details).
This also makes it possible for some players and smurfs to intentionally keep their ratings low by resigning early.

This PR changes the rating logic to always rate players regardless of when they leave the match.

Players leaving early can often reduce the quality of the match for one or all of the teams involved (for example, low rated player leaving and getting taken by high rated player or high rated player resigning early), however frequent leavers and early resigners should be dealt with in others ways (for example most games use some form of matchmaking cooldown).

@L-e-x-o-n L-e-x-o-n merged commit d7df6d3 into beyond-all-reason:master Dec 6, 2024
3 checks passed
@L-e-x-o-n L-e-x-o-n deleted the rate-leavers branch December 6, 2024 14:07
geekingfrog pushed a commit to geekingfrog/teiserver that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants