Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: use individual automats rather than robokop #46

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

colleenXu
Copy link
Contributor

@colleenXu colleenXu commented Oct 4, 2024

Related to biothings/biothings_explorer#865

@tokebe In case we want to switch to individual automats and try this out

UPDATE:
Waiting until next week to merge or not.
Automat reports they are improving robokop early next week.

@colleenXu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Slack pasting:

Evan Morris
Yesterday at 2:03 PM
Unfortunate, we will be deploying a new Automat version very soon which should
improve the speed of queries with large result sets
not return a 200 status for neo4j timeouts
Sending queries to specific plater instances could definitely help in certain cases in the meantime though, especially for queries involving genes and affects edges

Evan Morris
Today at 6:21 AM
I have just deployed new platers on dev that should be faster and have better error status codes when they do fail
Evan Morris
Today at 7:29 AM
We are planning to push these up to CI early next week

@colleenXu
Copy link
Contributor Author

We ended up switching back to our previous subset of individual automat APIs in #52, which was merged.

So this branch/PR is no longer needed

@colleenXu colleenXu closed this Dec 19, 2024
@colleenXu colleenXu deleted the individual-automat branch December 19, 2024 01:15
@colleenXu colleenXu restored the individual-automat branch December 19, 2024 01:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant