Add support for memberOf overlay #52239
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Jonno Sanderson-Smith <[email protected]>
|
As mentioned in #50524 (comment) it seems memberOf will be deprecated in future releases. |
|
All good. I'll look at the changes for the dynlist overlay again when I have some time to kill. |
|
@carrodher I am interested by this PR, what is missing to merge this new feature ? |
|
According to the latest comment, from @mdhont it seems |
|
The memberOf overlay was deprecated from 2.5, and based on the 2.5 & 2.6 man pages, support will be dropped in future releases. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of the change
This change extends the existing [bitnami/openldap:2.6] container deployment with configurable support for the existing memberOf module:
memberOfBenefits
Future users of the [bitnami/openldap] container will be able to access the Reverse Group Membership Maintenance module and functionality with minimal configuration.
Possible drawbacks
Applicable issues
Additional information
This change enabled the capability required to support the use case described in this issue