Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support pinning of solana tokens #16963

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2023
Merged

Support pinning of solana tokens #16963

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2023

Conversation

cypt4
Copy link
Collaborator

@cypt4 cypt4 commented Feb 1, 2023

Resolves brave/brave-browser#28000

Solana doesn't have token_id so we use * as token_id in the GetTokenPrefPath to construct token preference path.

Submitter Checklist:

  • I confirm that no security/privacy review is needed, or that I have requested one
  • There is a ticket for my issue
  • Used Github auto-closing keywords in the PR description above
  • Wrote a good PR/commit description
  • Squashed any review feedback or "fixup" commits before merge, so that history is a record of what happened in the repo, not your PR
  • Added appropriate labels (QA/Yes or QA/No; release-notes/include or release-notes/exclude; OS/...) to the associated issue
  • Checked the PR locally:
    • npm run test -- brave_browser_tests, npm run test -- brave_unit_tests wiki
    • npm run lint, npm run presubmit wiki, npm run gn_check, npm run tslint
  • Ran git rebase master (if needed)

Reviewer Checklist:

  • A security review is not needed, or a link to one is included in the PR description
  • New files have MPL-2.0 license header
  • Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
  • Major classes, functions and non-trivial code blocks are well-commented
  • Changes in component dependencies are properly reflected in gn
  • Code follows the style guide
  • Test plan is specified in PR before merging

After-merge Checklist:

Test Plan:

Test pinning SOL token pinning. Ex: https://magiceden.io/item-details/7tSu4udrnQXbs92ocYboCCHMxpmq1ufDyxzGMmzY62UL

@cypt4 cypt4 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 1, 2023 20:24
@cypt4 cypt4 force-pushed the brave_28000 branch 2 times, most recently from 52e3eaa to 4aa17f0 Compare February 2, 2023 12:20
@cypt4 cypt4 requested a review from supermassive February 7, 2023 16:02
Comment on lines 523 to 653
absl::optional<std::string> service,
mojom::BlockchainTokenPtr token,
Copy link
Collaborator

@supermassive supermassive Feb 9, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

const & for service and token

Comment on lines 322 to 325
FetchMetadata(*url,
base::BindOnce(&NftMetadataFetcher::CompleteGetSolTokenMetadata,
weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(), url.value(),
std::move(callback)));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both either *url or url.value() to be consistent

@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ const char kErrorMessage[] = "error_message";
const char kAssetUrlListKey[] = "cids";

namespace {

// Solana NFTs doesn't have token_id
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: don't

mojom::BlockchainTokenPtr token,
const std::string& token_url,
const std::string& result,
AddPinCallback callback) {
GURL token_gurl = GURL(token_url);
if (!token_gurl.SchemeIs(ipfs::kIPFSScheme)) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we also fail here if whole url is not valid?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is only one check for url to have ipfs scheme, not sure if it is enough.

Copy link
Collaborator

@supermassive supermassive left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with some minor comments

@cypt4 cypt4 force-pushed the brave_28000 branch 3 times, most recently from a34fbf0 to 662cc44 Compare March 22, 2023 14:25
@cypt4 cypt4 merged commit 348b145 into master Mar 22, 2023
@cypt4 cypt4 deleted the brave_28000 branch March 22, 2023 19:22
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 1.51.x - Nightly milestone Mar 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NFT Pinning for Solana tokens
2 participants