Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(arm): implement CKV_AZURE_97 for ARM #5515

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 18, 2023
Merged

Conversation

JamesWoolfenden
Copy link
Contributor

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

New/Edited policies (Delete if not relevant)

Description

Include a description of what makes it a violation and any relevant external links.

Fix

How does someone fix the issue in code and/or in runtime?

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my feature, policy, or fix is effective and works
  • New and existing tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@JamesWoolfenden JamesWoolfenden temporarily deployed to scan-security August 31, 2023 10:54 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@JamesWoolfenden JamesWoolfenden temporarily deployed to scan-security August 31, 2023 22:04 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@JamesWoolfenden JamesWoolfenden temporarily deployed to scan-security August 31, 2023 22:41 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@gruebel gruebel temporarily deployed to scan-security October 13, 2023 09:01 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

@gruebel gruebel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🍺

@gruebel gruebel merged commit e732e21 into main Oct 18, 2023
29 checks passed
@gruebel gruebel deleted the feat/VMEncryptionAtHostEnabled branch October 18, 2023 14:10
@mmassey1993
Copy link

Hi,

This merge has now broken my checkov for the things you have tried to resolve. I am now getting errors of CKV_AZURE_97 on my tests asking for encryptionAtHost property to be set to true on my Bicep virtual machine modules, which it already is.

Please can you review the code. Looks like it tries to find the "virtualMachineProfile" property, something which doesnt exist in Bicep. There is a securityProfile property though.

Many thanks

Michael

@gruebel
Copy link
Contributor

gruebel commented Oct 20, 2023

hey @mmassey1993 thanks for reaching out.

I checked the code and also the Bicep docs. If you define a Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets resource, then securityProfile is found under virtualMachineProfile. If it is a Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines resource, then is just securityProfile. Without an example of the resource, which is failing for you I can't say why is failing.

@mmassey1993
Copy link

Yeah i have that. This is one of the modules that fails now for me on the check:
resource VM 'Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines@2021-11-01' = {
name: virtualMachineName
location: location
tags: tags
properties: {
networkProfile: {
networkInterfaces: [
{
id: networkInterface.id
}
]
}
osProfile: {
computerName: virtualMachineName
adminUsername: username
adminPassword: password
}
licenseType: 'Windows_Server'
hardwareProfile: {
vmSize: 'Standard_D2s_v5'
}
securityProfile: {
encryptionAtHost: true
}
storageProfile: {
osDisk: {
createOption: 'FromImage'
managedDisk: {
storageAccountType: 'StandardSSD_LRS'
}
}
dataDisks: [
{
diskSizeGB: 1023
lun: 0
createOption: 'Empty'
}
]
imageReference: {
publisher: 'MicrosoftWindowsServer'
offer: 'WindowsServer'
sku: '2022-datacenter-azure-edition'
version: 'latest'
}
}
}
}

@gruebel
Copy link
Contributor

gruebel commented Oct 20, 2023

thanks, found the issue. We check against a string not a boolean. I will prepare a fix for it 🙂

@mmassey1993
Copy link

Awesome thank you. Please let me know when resolved :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants