feat(rust): show interactive menu to select one or more TCP inlent when user dosen't specifies

[0x61nas]

Make ockam tcp-inlet delete (no args) interactive by asking the user to choose from a list of tcp-inlet aliases to delete using tuify

After this PR gets merged and if no one takes (#6465, #6464, #6463 and #6462) I'll apply the same changes in one or multiple othr PRs to close them

• Closes: Make ockam tcp-inlet delete (no args) interactive by asking the user to choose from a list of tcp-inlet aliases to delete (tuify) #6466

Current behavior

Shows an error message when the user didn't specify an alias

Proposed changes

• Make the alias argument optional
• Check if the user specifies an alias or not
• if so, then do the old behavior (check, confirm, delete)
• if not, and the terminal is interactive, and the user didn't pass any of --no-output or --quiet flags
  • then collect all exists TCP inlets aliases in the (selected or default) node
  • Shows them in a multi selection TUI menu
  • confirm and delete

Checks

• All commits in this Pull Request are signed and Verified by Github.
• All commits in this Pull Request follow the Ockam commit message convention.
• There are no Merge commits in this Pull Request. Ockam repo maintains a linear commit history. We merge Pull Requests by rebasing them onto the develop branch. Rebasing to the latest develop branch and force pushing to your Pull Request branch is okay.
• I have read and accept the Ockam Community Code of Conduct.
• I have read and accepted the Ockam Contributor License Agreement by adding my Git/Github details in a row at the end of the CONTRIBUTORS.csv file in a separate pull request to the build-trust/ockam repository. done via: build-trust/ockam-contributors/pull/266

[adrianbenavides]

Hi @0x61nas , thanks for submitting this PR! We recently merged the first PR related to making some commands interactive at #6480

That PR can serve as a guide on how to use some common functionalities that are now available as part of the Terminal struct. Make sure to rebase latest develop. And let me know if you have any questions!

[0x61nas]

@adrianbenavides Hi, is there any plan to review this anytime soon(in this October)?. Hope you have a nice day.

[adrianbenavides]

It's looking great @0x61nas ! We have two similar PR's related to other show commands where we are using a different structure to handle the multiple use cases. My only request for now would be to adapt your PR to that structure (check #6547 and #6665). Let me know if you have any questions!

[mrinalwadhwa]

@0x61nas while we still have to review this change. I'm adding the HACKTOBERFEST-ACCEPTED label so the contribution is counted by hacktoberfest bots before the end of October. Thank you for taking time to contribute 🎉

Please not @adrianbenavides's feedback above.

[0x61nas]

It's looking great @0x61nas ! We have two similar PR's related to other show commands where we are using a different structure to handle the multiple use cases. My only request for now would be to adapt your PR to that structure (check #6547 and #6665). Let me know if you have any questions!

fine, i'll follow it

[adrianbenavides]

Hi @0x61nas , your PR will be merged through #6886 Thanks again for your help!