feat: #64 execution plan review #113
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… + dividing it to more self-explanatory agent roles for making resourcePlanner life easier
… a custom one - planing the execution plan ahead
|
What should we do with this PR? Aside from fixing the issue that you mentioned? Shall we do anything with that static supervisor? 👯♀️ |
|
I'll test it on Monday and if it works fine I'd suggest adding this new supervisor as an example wdyt? |
|
Yeah why not! We can have a few, and actually, maybe I'll add parallel one as example too for now - to treat it as experimental? |
|
Great idea 🙌 |
|
I can even imagine a distributed one - so there are few servers and resourcePlanner is using a tool to send a http request with a task for another instance to process. This is entirely possible due to our server architecture Wdyt? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is just a PoC - not to be merged in. It shows how to replace a default supervisor with a custom one.
@grabbou I think I discovered an inconsistency/bug (?) - the supervisor is not able to run the tools. In this case, running the tools would make a lot of sense for getting the exec plan acceptance.